Hi Joel,
Joel Madero píše v Út 19. 06. 2012 v 13:36 -0700:
I moved this to a new thread because the subject here didn't really
accurately portray the direction of the conversation
The mail includes many good questions and proposals that might move us
forward. I'll try to answer it later this
Thanks for the advice. I thought I had included the qa list, my mistake. As
for the length, I agree and I almost didn't include it but that was an
email in response to mine so I felt a bit obligated to respond despite the
length.
I had another side question, the response to the thread was made
Joel Madero píše v St 20. 06. 2012 v 08:08 -0700:
Thanks for the advice. I thought I had included the qa list, my
mistake. As for the length, I agree and I almost didn't include it but
that was an email in response to mine so I felt a bit obligated to
respond despite the length.
If only I
Hi Joel,
On 2012-06-15 at 23:09 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
I brainstormed a bit today and I came up with this flowchart. Looking
for input. I read through email threads and see that prioritizing bugs
has been an interesting discussion but as of now looks to be pretty
unsettled. I'm going to
Joel Madero píše v Pá 15. 06. 2012 v 23:09 -0700:
I brainstormed a bit today and I came up with this flowchart. Looking
for input. I read through email threads and see that prioritizing bugs
has been an interesting discussion but as of now looks to be pretty
unsettled. I'm going to make a
Joel Madero schrieb:
I brainstormed a bit today and I came up with this flowchart.
Hi Joel,
great to see that all in a chart, your conclusions and definitions seem
plausible.
But the chart also shows the limitations of that concept: It's really
sophisticated, and no developer will sit at
I'll modify the orientation today or tomorrow and try to see where
regression should fit. I think that it has to go in Priority and not in
Severity. As for how devs use it, I agree completely that right now it's
almost useless but maybe if it becomes more uniform and it actually
provides some
Rainer Bielefeld píše v Po 18. 06. 2012 v 13:21 +0200:
Joel Madero schrieb:
I brainstormed a bit today and I came up with this flowchart.
Hi Joel,
great to see that all in a chart, your conclusions and definitions seem
plausible.
But the chart also shows the limitations of that
Joel Madero píše v Po 18. 06. 2012 v 09:32 -0700:
Version 2, changed orientation and tried to take comments into
account. Let me know what you all think.
It is much better readable. I finally got a better picture :-)
Well, I think that it still need some thinking. You set inability to
safe as
I agree with the save comment, I'll change that right now. Also
realized I didn't put a note in for regressions so I added to the
bottom notes:
**Regressions**
Special attention should be paid to regressions. In most cases a
regression calls for an increase in priority but in some cases it will
Hello,
may I suggest that this list of eight important points of consideration
should be included in this http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugTriage
page?
For me it would be great if I could have an authorative advise about how
to deal with open bugs...
Greetings,
Marc
Am 08.06.2012
Hi Joel,
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 23:49 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
Sure thing, I'll include it here and add a link as soon as I post over
at freedesktop bugs
This is prolly best on the libreoffice-qa list (I just CC'd it) - but
it's interesting on the hackers list too. Your cleanup sounds
Hi Joel,
On 2012-06-07 at 23:49 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
1. If there has been a request for information and there has been no
response for 30+ days I'm putting NEEDINFO
2. If two or more people have said that they do not have the bug I'm
doing the following if there hasn't been action for
One more thing to add to this. Last night when I did some (I think I did
about 25-50 so it wasn't too many) I was doing the following:
If someone asked is this reproducible in the latest release, but didn't
say anything else as to if they themselves had tried to reproduce it. I
would mark as
14 matches
Mail list logo
