Re: [Libreoffice-qa] No activity warnings - EasyHacks
Hi Joel, Tommy, Tommy píše v Pá 24. 10. 2014 v 22:22 +0200: I suppose we shouldn't be sending these to EasyHacks - I guess it's worth treating them separately :-) Is it possible to skip EasyHacks when sending these, please? What would be the rationale for skipping them for easy hacks? These get fixed just as inadvertently as other bugs. Just curious The Easy Hacks usually are a kind of features; and features are usually unlikely to be fixed / implemented inadvertently... From my point of view, it would be better to batch-review the EasyHacks I guess - to see that they really are Easy Hacks - with existing, reasonable code pointers, etc. But that's probably hard to do ATM, so I'd avoid any retest pings there; or at least phrase them differently - in the Easy Hacks, the pings shouldn't be about retesting, but more about the review of the Easy Hack itself, because the fact that it was not taken might indicate that it is not an Easy Hack in the first place :-) maybe Jan is complaining of the spam that is generated in the dev list by any retest ping message that hits easy hacks. No, I did not mean that, sorry for not being clear. All the best, Kendy ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] No activity warnings - EasyHacks
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:18:04PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: But that's probably hard to do ATM, so I'd avoid any retest pings there; or at least phrase them differently - in the Easy Hacks, the pings shouldn't be about retesting, but more about the review of the Easy Hack itself, because the fact that it was not taken might indicate that it is not an Easy Hack in the first place :-) Indeed. For everything else, lets please refrain from adding automated messages to EasyHacks, if possible -- they are supposed to be read by an enthusiastic new contributor and too many comments (esp. over 10 comments and automated ones) are quite a demotivating turn-off. Best, Bjoern ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] No activity warnings - EasyHacks
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:23:31 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:18:04PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: But that's probably hard to do ATM, so I'd avoid any retest pings there; or at least phrase them differently - in the Easy Hacks, the pings shouldn't be about retesting, but more about the review of the Easy Hack itself, because the fact that it was not taken might indicate that it is not an Easy Hack in the first place :-) Indeed. For everything else, lets please refrain from adding automated messages to EasyHacks, if possible -- they are supposed to be read by an enthusiastic new contributor and too many comments (esp. over 10 comments and automated ones) are quite a demotivating turn-off. Best, Bjoern I understand your point and you are both right. If we do another ping retest thing we will keep the easy hacks out of it ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] No activity warnings - EasyHacks
Hi, I've seen a Your bug was confirmed at least 1 year ago and has not had any activity on it for over a year. Your bug is still set to NEW which means that it is open and confirmed. It would be nice to have the bug confirmed on a newer version than the version reported in the original report to know that the bug is still present -- sometimes a bug is inadvertently fixed over time and just never closed. warning in one of the EasyHacks (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30425). I suppose we shouldn't be sending these to EasyHacks - I guess it's worth treating them separately :-) Is it possible to skip EasyHacks when sending these, please? Thank you, Kendy ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] No activity warnings - EasyHacks
On 10/24/2014 11:59 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: I suppose we shouldn't be sending these to EasyHacks - I guess it's worth treating them separately :-) Is it possible to skip EasyHacks when sending these, please? See Joel's Spam Apalogies sent yesterday. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] No activity warnings - EasyHacks
On 10/24/2014 02:59 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi, I've seen a Your bug was confirmed at least 1 year ago and has not had any activity on it for over a year. Your bug is still set to NEW which means that it is open and confirmed. It would be nice to have the bug confirmed on a newer version than the version reported in the original report to know that the bug is still present -- sometimes a bug is inadvertently fixed over time and just never closed. warning in one of the EasyHacks (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30425). I suppose we shouldn't be sending these to EasyHacks - I guess it's worth treating them separately :-) Is it possible to skip EasyHacks when sending these, please? What would be the rationale for skipping them for easy hacks? These get fixed just as inadvertently as other bugs. Just curious Best, Joel ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
