Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Severity level - propose (minor/normal ?) change in policy

2016-08-23 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Stuart, V Stuart Foote wrote on 23-08-16 14:03: > Sorry, but normal is too high for most interoperability issues. > > "minor loss of function, or other problem where easy workaround is present" And my proposal is to make an explicit exception for issues that limit interoperability. As Pedro

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Severity level - propose (minor/normal ?) change in policy

2016-08-23 Thread Pedro
eroperability is important. Just my 2 cents. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Severity-level-propose-minor-normal-change-in-policy-tp4191520p4191549.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Severity level - propose (minor/normal ?) change in policy

2016-08-23 Thread V Stuart Foote
iance with standards is best for long term health. Code the filters to the standards, and do not get sidetracked chasing other program implementations. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Severity-level-propose-minor-normal-change-

[Libreoffice-qa] Severity level - propose (minor/normal ?) change in policy

2016-08-23 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi, I want to propose a change to severity levels. IMO interoperabillity issues should ~never be minor. Ideas, objections? Ciao - Cor *) https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Severity -- Cor Nouws GPD key ID: 0xB13480A6 - 591A 30A7 36A0 CE3C 3D28 A038 E49D 7365 B134 80A6 - v