Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Use of Navigation Toolbar

> Message du 10/12/13 17:12 > De : "Samuel Mehrbrodt" > Well, your proposal to create a new toolbar was also in the Survey. Yes, and I thank you. I just wanted to apologize for not being able to vote while everything was set up ... > Concerning the "History" feature you suggest to remove the too

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Use of Navigation Toolbar

Hi > Message du 10/12/13 09:43 > > But for the Navigation Toolbar: I've never seen any use of it (which > > does nos say everything, but still..). Maybe it's a remainder from the > > time that StarOffice had some integrated desktop and such?? Cheers, > Maybe? If I was to decide, I would remove thi

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Remove the Navigator button below the scrollbar in Writer

Hi Jean-Baptiste, all Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote > Even if this button is not the right implementation of the function, the > function is useful and should be kept. +1 Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote > That means a function being accessible in the default UI, and not only in > the Navigator or in a

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Remove the Navigator button below the scrollbar in Writer

Hello I usually use this feature - To quickly change the type of navigation - To navigate The buttons are still accessible (vs. the browser that is not always visible) They are "well located": it is logical for me to have them close to the vertical scrollbar (scroll through the document in that

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Merging Calc's label range functionality with named range.

Hello > Message du 26/07/13 16:44 > De : "Kohei Yoshida" > > I found that the "automatic find label" option *is* used. > which really bothers me. We should at the very least turn this off by > default, and work toward deprecating this in the future (as Eike also > pointed out). > > Any objection t

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Merging Calc's label range functionality with named range.

Hello All > Message du 23/07/13 19:46 > And the original goal of my post was to figure out whether there are > people who use it, and if yes, what proportion of users (roughly), and > whether or not their use cases could be possibly fulfilled by either > named ranges or database ranges. Somehow

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Template manager issues pending

Hello to all Just to clarify this because I fear that my proposals have been misunderstood. >> 61396 - FILEOPEN: [Template Manager]Possibility to >> edit a template that is not in the repository, is lacking >> I saw a comment with the proposal : >> "when a user does "Open" from the "File" men

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Editing external templates

Hello > Message du 26/03/13 16:45 > De : "Rafael Dominguez" > > Since the removal of the old template manager dialog, lots of user have > complaining that now they cant open external templates for edit. > After talking to Cedric about it we concluded that we have two options: > > 1.- Add the actio

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Use case of "Repeat heading" in Insert table dialog

Hello Samuel Mehrbrodt-2 wrote > Why would someone want to repeat the heading in the first rows? To avoid having to replicate Attached is an example RepeatTitle.odt Regards Pierre-Yves -- View this message in contex

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Libreoffice-qa] LO 3.6.2 : about Manage dialog from Conditional Formatting

Hello A great and beautiful work has been done, thank you for that. I hope my poor English will not betray my goal which is trying to improve this feature. I would like to continue to discuss it constructively... My message will be a bit long because it is necessary to detail the steps, sorry

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [3.6]Basic IDE "object catalog" not consistent with other dockables windows

Hello Although I like the new "docked" feature, it seems to me that the Basic IDE "object catalog" is not consistent with other dockables windows (dock/undock, show/hide). See bug 52223 What do you think ? Regards Pierre-Yves -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 32700] UI: Make Track Changes Color "by author" adjustable

Rainer Bielefeld-2 wrote > > Will you submit an Enhancement Request and put me to CC? > Done : fdo#51945 Regards Pierre-Yves -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-ux-advise-Bug-32700-UI-Make-Track-Changes-Color-by-author-adjustable-tp3994419p399

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 32700] UI: Make Track Changes Color "by author" adjustable

Hello The requested enhancement is that the colors assigned to each authors will be more contrasted, more "visible" on the screen. I do not see any workaround today (colors are not included in the document). This made me found a "limitation of feature" more annoying, IMHO. "Edit> Changes> Acce

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Disabling file opening and saving in print preview mode

Hello Rainer Bielefeld-2 wrote > > I don't know how many users use the Page settings possibility in Page > preview (Regina Henschel broght up this point). > as I said http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-ux-advise-Disabling-file-opening-and-saving-in-print-preview-mode-td3987093

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Disabling file opening and saving in print preview mode

Hello Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote > > The most useful thing about the Page Preview indeed seems to be > modifying margins... > Yes but changing margins is not used alone. We also use "Format Page", often by trial and error to adjust the scaling mode & scaling factor, even the orientation som

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] conditional format dialog

Hi Regina Regina Henschel wrote > > When using a formula as condition, the relative references in the > formula are based on the address of the current cell. It would be nice, > if this base address is shown in the dialog. > +1 Regina Henschel wrote > > I know, that I can drag the dialog

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] conditional format dialog

Hi I also like new style via the combo. I agree with the remark about including enable / disable option (I pointed out that it's based on a nonexistent property to date). But I'm not sure that the checkbox (left of "Condition x") would be unambiguous as it is currently used to remove a condi

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] conditional format dialog

Cor Nouws wrote > >> The plus and minus keys to add - delete conditions (delete reset the >> condition) > > Are those supposed to be available for each condition? > something like that (I included the enable property if we can add it) http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n3743459/Captur

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] conditional format dialog

Hi I forgot to mention that it would be interesting to keep the check box for each condition, to add the management of the state "Enabled Yes/No" of the condition Regards Pierre-Yves -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-ux-advise-conditional-format-

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] conditional format dialog

Hi In the same token, there are good ideas in the "conditional formatting" dialog of the extension "report builder" (see screenshot). - Up and Down keys to change the order of conditions - The plus and minus keys to add - delete conditions (delete reset the condition) http://nabble.documentfounda

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] conditional format dialog

Hello Markus Are you sure of the number ? This Issue (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45085) seems to me not related with conditionnal formatting ? Regards PYS -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-ux-advise-conditional-format-dialog-tp3