[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157006] UX review needed for Options - Writer - Compatibility dialog

2023-09-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157006 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157006] UX review needed for Options - Writer - Compatibility dialog

2023-09-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157006 --- Comment #8 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #0) > * better sequencing of options? I would consider placing all options together and dropping the "like OOo 1.1" text in favor of the drop-down list box I

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157006] UX review needed for Options - Writer - Compatibility dialog

2023-09-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157006 --- Comment #7 from Eyal Rozenberg --- Created attachment 189559 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=189559=edit MS Word 2004 Mac compatibility dialog Note the drop-down list box with the choice of app + version

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157006] UX review needed for Options - Writer - Compatibility dialog

2023-09-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157006 --- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #4) > (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2) > > "Microsoft compatible Form menu" maybe. But I'd rather omit this option as a > > corner case and to clean up

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157006] UX review needed for Options - Writer - Compatibility dialog

2023-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157006 --- Comment #5 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #0) > * better sequencing of options? Is is possible to put the more common/more important options first (and least important/common last)? For less

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157006] UX review needed for Options - Writer - Compatibility dialog

2023-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157006 --- Comment #4 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2) > "Microsoft compatible Form menu" maybe. But I'd rather omit this option as a > corner case and to clean up the dialog. Does "clean up..." mean a

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157006] UX review needed for Options - Writer - Compatibility dialog

2023-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157006 --- Comment #3 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- Created attachment 189341 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=189341=edit screenshot of Windows dialog for Compatibility options (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157006] UX review needed for Options - Writer - Compatibility dialog

2023-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157006 --- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze --- Created attachment 189339 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=189339=edit Dialog (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #0) > * better sequencing of options? > >e.g., all

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157006] UX review needed for Options - Writer - Compatibility dialog

2023-08-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157006 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||113944