On 16.01.2019 15:41, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it is confusing, when the most stable version does not compile, as it
> happened to me, and when this is not going to
> change.
>
> I suggest recomending only versions, which either compile, or in case they
> don’t compile, they are
Hello,
it is confusing, when the most stable version does not compile, as it happened
to me, and when this is not going to
change.
I suggest recomending only versions, which either compile, or in case they
don’t compile, they are supposed to be
publically tweaked to compile.
Regards
Дилян
Hello,
yes that theme and that unfortunate wording is already on our radar:
http://document-foundation-mail-archive.969070.n3.nabble.com/TDF-marketing-discussion-paper-td4255766.html
Suggestions for improvements always welcome. :-)
Am 16.01.2019 um 12:49 schrieb Дилян Палаузов:
Hello,
what
On 16.01.2019 14:49, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
> Hello,
>
> what I wanted to ask was, why does the LO-ebpage recommend for enterprises
> end of life products.
>
> My understanding of the processes is, that there are usually a stable
> version, that is not end-of-live, and a most
> current version,
Hello,
what I wanted to ask was, why does the LO-ebpage recommend for enterprises end
of life products.
My understanding of the processes is, that there are usually a stable version,
that is not end-of-live, and a most
current version, at the same time. However there are gaps, when the
On 16.01.19 10:57, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
Hello,
https://www.libreoffice.org/download/download/ says: LO 6.1.4 is for technology
enthusiasts and 6.0.7 is for enterprises
or conservative users. I read: 6.1.4 is development and 6.0.7 is stable.
development happens on "master", and new features
