Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 21:23:14 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Unsubscribe
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 12:41:21AM -0800, Matthew Hanson wrote:
Gee I miss the entertaining days of Pres Waterman, and the whole unscribble
issue!
Well, time and technology have marched
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 14:50:23 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Unsubscribe
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 01:27:19PM -0800, Matthew Hanson wrote:
What would be different with a ezmlm installation other than dealing with
unscribblers?
Well, it'll essentially behave the same
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 02:33:49 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Re: TEST
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 11:07:37AM -0700, Lawrence Fieman wrote:
Just seeing if this list is working on my computer.
Seems to be working again, though SmartMax MailMax is now dumping out
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 15:59:02 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Tracy LAM/CAI/NYC/BANQUE_INDOSUEZ/FR is out of the
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:55:23AM -0700, Raymond wrote:
Uh oh ... mail loops anyone?
Fortunately, Tracy's autoresponder seems to be well-behaved
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 21:06:33 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Tracy LAM/CAI/NYC/BANQUE_INDOSUEZ/FR is out of the
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:30:26AM -0700, neil barnes wrote:
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fortunately, Tracy's autoresponder seems to be well
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 22:03:08 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Tracy LAM/CAI/NYC/BANQUE_INDOSUEZ/FR is out of the
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 06:27:08AM -0700, neil barnes wrote:
Be careful what you wish for :)
Having lived through /three/ of them (including a digest
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 21:58:47 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Tracy LAM/CAI/NYC/BANQUE_INDOSUEZ/FR is out of the
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 06:41:47AM -0700, Raymond wrote:
Of course, someone else posed the hypothetical that if someone on the
digest did the same
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 18:17:02 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Libretto/linux file system problem
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 12:59:02AM -0700, Christian Gennerat wrote:
Now I am with Mandrake 8.0 base and ext3fs
~ uname -a
Linux bcv66vbb. 2.4.17 #3 mer mar 27 09:57:59
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:34:35 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Experiences trying to get Linux onto this
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 04:34:57AM -0800, Raymond wrote:
Of course, now my next problem is I can't for the life of me get this
blasted PCMCIA card services thing
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 08:09:26 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Experiences trying to get Linux onto this
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 12:44:57PM -0800, Clarence wrote:
the pcmcia cardservices takes its config info from the kernel that
you are currently running. Even
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 17:20:40 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Linux on Lib70
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 12:39:58AM -0800, Matthew Hanson wrote:
I'll refrain from wondering too
loudly what the process of mount it as a loopback device' is.
Well, you sure wondered loud
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 19:20:16 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Win98 Toshiba drivers on 20GB HDD setup et al
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 01:28:26AM -0800, neil barnes wrote:
Of course, you could go to www.linuxfromscratch.com and roll your own...
You'd need a pretty
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 17:12:57 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Out of Office AutoReply: [LIBRETTO] Libretto Digest
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 06:33:04PM -0800, Raymond wrote:
Hmm ... mail loops anyone? ;-)
More like perfect (mail) storms. The 200MB inboxes I mentioned
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:41:31 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Out of Office AutoReply: [LIBRETTO] Libretto Digest
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 03:08:05AM -0800, Raymond wrote:
Actually, if Tom's autoresponder had quoted the entire digest back, as
did happen in a couple
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 22:46:21 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Out of Office AutoReply: [LIBRETTO] Libretto Digest
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:38:04AM -0800, Raymond wrote:
Uh oh don't tell me we'll be getting one of these for every message
that hits the list
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 01:30:55 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Virus
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 09:19:19AM -0800, phillip ramirez wrote:
But looks like it orig from a 65.174.101.7 ip address
All Libretto list mail passes through that address, and all Libretto list
mail
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 02:05:12 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Virus
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 09:39:28AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did anyone look at the headers?
Yeah. They shed /zero/ useful info. I could claim to be you on a
nasty-gram, and no one
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 00:21:49 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Format
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 08:54:50AM -0700, Vidar Grønvold wrote:
On solution can be to shell out 29 dollars for the mail-capable
newsreader Agent from www.forteinc.com . Thats the client I use
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:03:35 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Format
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 05:20:09PM -0700, Raymond wrote:
Whats wrong with this maillist?
There are a couple of annoyances related to SVList operations:
* An extra copy of header fields
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 17:30:59 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Libretto Digest #1428 (Out of Office)
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:05:26AM -0700, neil barnes wrote:
Seven days to go...isn't 'out of office' software only supposed to send
*once* to an address?
Most
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 17:14:40 +0800
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: libretto sucessor?
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 02:10:43AM -0700, Andy Lawn wrote:
For right-pondians, the Diamond Mako is in fact a Psion Revo, so $99 is a
_very_ good price. Not sure if either of the reatailers
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 22:52:05 +0800 (SGT)
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Screen smashed! Where do I go?
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Lawrence Young wrote:
Unfortuantely your dealer told you the truth this time. The only place to
get a replacement LCD screen is from Toshiba which
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:02:13 +0800 (SGT)
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 802.11b hardware (Re: wireless pcmcia cards)
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, James wrote:
So they actually work as access points under linux, excellent !
Nope, they work like standard Ethernet devices. Any
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:00:32 +0800 (SGT)
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: unsubscribe digest
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Pres Waterman wrote:
should work correctly for the majority of MUAs that grok links in message
text. That leaves a (hopefully) minority of folks who'll type
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:05:19 +0800 (SGT)
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: unsubscribe digest
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Pres Waterman wrote:
Since the "mailto" thing seems to work, and I wonder if it is due to
the mail CLIENT responding correctly, I wonder if it could
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:10:20 +0800 (SGT)
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: H Re: unsubscribe digest
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, neil barnes wrote:
damned if I know what a MUA is though!
MUA = Mail User Agent. Pine, elm, mutt, etc. Some even count Outlook
Express in this category
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 20:09:52 +0800 (SGT)
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: unsubscribe digest
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Matthew Hanson wrote:
UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=cmd:unsubscribedigest
Shouldn't that be:
mailto:[EMAIL
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 21:47:46 +0800 (SGT)
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: unsubscribe digest
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Adrian Ho wrote:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject="cmd:unsubscribe digest"
Silly me:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=cmd:unsubscribe%20digest
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 13:10:23 +0800 (SGT)
From: Adrian Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: unsubscribe digest
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Pres Waterman wrote:
That would be wrong. It needs the space for the digest to be unsubscribed.
Not 2 spaces, and not DIGEST as some have tried.
I showed
29 matches
Mail list logo
