On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Borey wrote:
> Seems that release date is moving. When we can expect 1.1 ?
I already mentioned this:
http://daniel.haxx.se/projects/libssh2/mail/libssh2-devel-archive-2009-03/0069.shtml
But I can't promise anything. It depends on how much sleep I can skip, and how
my block
Hi Daniel.
Seems that release date is moving.
When we can expect 1.1 ?
Thanks and regards.
2009/3/17 Daniel Stenberg
> Hey
>
> This is just a note that I plan to put together a libssh2 1.1 release in
> exactly week. I aim at March 24th for release day, but if something pops up
> I
> can move i
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> And yeah, whatever you want in the release (or not), now is a good time to
> speak up!
Okay, so I'd like to get Heiner Steven's problems with non-blocking use
properly researched and hopefully fixed first, to feel sufficiently sure that
libssh2 doe
Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> Twas brillig at 17:24:34 21.03.2009 UTC-04 when e...@nanobyte.org did gyre
> and gimble:
>
> ES> From a quick read of this excerpt from "C in a Nutshell"
>
> Erm. Not quite a respectable source. Please provide another one: C99,
> POSIX, SUS - nearly anything will be ok.
Twas brillig at 17:24:34 21.03.2009 UTC-04 when e...@nanobyte.org did gyre and
gimble:
ES> From a quick read of this excerpt from "C in a Nutshell"
Erm. Not quite a respectable source. Please provide another one: C99,
POSIX, SUS - nearly anything will be ok.
ES> The attached patch against th
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Dan Fandrich wrote:
In the spirit of being pedantic, names beginning with a single underscore
are supposed to be reserved for the OS and libraries. Although, since
libssh2 is a library that ships with lots of Linux-derived OSes, it could
probably fa
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Dan Fandrich wrote:
> In the spirit of being pedantic, names beginning with a single underscore
> are supposed to be reserved for the OS and libraries. Although, since
> libssh2 is a library that ships with lots of Linux-derived OSes, it could
> probably fall under that loo
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 02:55:28PM +0100, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> In the same spirit, I've just run over a lot of functions in libssh2 and
> renamed them to use the _libssh2_ prefix properly for library-wide internal
> functions, as only the ones using libssh2_ are meant to be externally present
>
> Should we perhaps make a local wrapper for send() and recv() so that we could
> put this logic only at a single spot?
>>
> Like into _libssh2_recv() and _libssh2_send() functions that sets errno?
I like that idea.
--
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, E L wrote:
> The past thread got sidetracked, so forgot about it. Is the bug clear?
> libssh2 uses errno, but win32 recv() and send() do not set errno, so libssh2
> code needs to set errno based on WSAGetLastError() after calling send() or
> recv().
Should we perhaps make
>
>> Socket errors are not properly handled for win32. If the call to recv() or
>> send() fails, then WSAGetLastError() needs to be called to get the error.
>> In two spots this is mostly done: session.c:116 and transport.c:370.
>> However, not all errors are covered in the switch and there is no
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, E L wrote:
> Socket errors are not properly handled for win32. If the call to recv() or
> send() fails, then WSAGetLastError() needs to be called to get the error.
> In two spots this is mostly done: session.c:116 and transport.c:370.
> However, not all errors are covered
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
>> I believe the patch is good, and it has been tested in Debian by Mikhail.
>> Ok to commit?
>
> Sure, go ahead!
In the same spirit, I've just run over a lot of functions in libssh2 and
renamed them to use the _libssh2_ prefix properly for library-wi
> And yeah, whatever you want in the release (or not), now is a good time to
> speak up!
I mentioned this before, here:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=20080929190548.5551c6db%40gideon&forum_name=libssh2-devel
Socket errors are not properly handled for win32. If the cal
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> I wrote up a blog entry
It sounds like SFTP builds on SCP at one point in that post. I would
like to clarify that that is not the case, however it is of course
correct that SFTP adds another layer of protocol on top of the
channels used by SCP. (This because SCP is just a
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=87ab8mnkya.fsf%40vertex.dottedmag.net&forum_name=libssh2-devel
>
> I believe the patch is good, and it has been tested in Debian by Mikhail.
> Ok to commit?
Sure, go ahead!
--
/ daniel.hax
Twas brillig at 11:02:43 17.03.2009 UTC+01 when si...@josefsson.org did gyre
and gimble:
SJ> How about reducing the number of exported symbols?
SJ> Ok to commit?
ack
--
pgpGcrvxNFLIU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Daniel Stenberg writes:
> Hey
>
> This is just a note that I plan to put together a libssh2 1.1 release in
> exactly week. I aim at March 24th for release day, but if something pops up I
> can move it a bit.
>
> I also won't commit any feature changes or anything before the release, but
> I'll
Hey
This is just a note that I plan to put together a libssh2 1.1 release in
exactly week. I aim at March 24th for release day, but if something pops up I
can move it a bit.
I also won't commit any feature changes or anything before the release, but
I'll be more than happy to work on bugs if y
19 matches
Mail list logo
