On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 05:49:00 +0100
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> I've tweaked the test a bit more to skip on systems without shared
> libraries at all (or when --disable-shared was used), to ensure
> library_names is always initialized and to source only files from the
> current directory, added a
* Pierre Ossman wrote on Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:21:54AM CET:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:31:07 +0100 > Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > I managed to send out a broken version of the patch. Please forget that
> > one, this one has a testcase that should work better. Can you retry
> > with it? You can
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:31:07 +0100
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I managed to send out a broken version of the patch. Please forget that
> one, this one has a testcase that should work better. Can you retry
> with it? You can use something like
>
> make all check-local TESTSUITEFLAGS='-v -d -x -
I managed to send out a broken version of the patch. Please forget that
one, this one has a testcase that should work better. Can you retry
with it? You can use something like
make all check-local TESTSUITEFLAGS='-v -d -x -k "deplibs without file
command"'
and it should pass if your libtool
* Pierre Ossman wrote on Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:13:41AM CET:
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:32:27 +0100 Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Pierre Ossman wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:01:40AM CET:
> > > The "normal" check was fixed some time ago, but the fallback code was
> > > overlooked. This patch fixes
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:32:27 +0100
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> [ dropping libtool@ ]
>
> Hi Pierre,
>
> thanks for the report and patch!
>
> * Pierre Ossman wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:01:40AM CET:
> > The "normal" check was fixed some time ago, but the fallback code was
> > overlooked. This
[ dropping libtool@ ]
Hi Pierre,
thanks for the report and patch!
* Pierre Ossman wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:01:40AM CET:
> The "normal" check was fixed some time ago, but the fallback code was
> overlooked. This patch fixes that as well.
So that means you've encountered it with some code
The "normal" check was fixed some time ago, but the fallback code was
overlooked. This patch fixes that as well.
Btw, why isn't the original fix (b5282894) in the 2.2.6b release? The
fix is over one year old and still isn't in any released version.
Rgds
--
Pierre OssmanOpenSource-bas
