* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 07:07:54PM CEST:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:08:06PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
_LT_TAGVAR(lt_simple_*_test_code, $1)=foo;\n
Which implies:
# _LT_*_BOILERPLATE([TAG])
I don't have any idea how to proceed
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:08:06PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Ah, you mean using _LT_TAGVAR without also using _LT_TAGDECL, right?
Yes, _LT_TAGVAR abstracts per language variables, _LT_TAGDECL pushes them
through config.status.
Thanks.
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:33:25AM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Two problems I want to kill with this patch:
- picky compiler(s|flags) warn about innocuous code and thus make the
`-c -o' and the pic_flag tests (among others) spuriously fail.
- some
Hallo Ralf!
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Ah, you mean using _LT_TAGVAR without also using _LT_TAGDECL, right?
Yes, _LT_TAGVAR abstracts per language variables, _LT_TAGDECL pushes them
through config.status.
Anyway, the changes you want me to make make more other changes
necessary. Will look into
Two problems I want to kill with this patch:
- picky compiler(s|flags) warn about innocuous code and thus make the
`-c -o' and the pic_flag tests (among others) spuriously fail.
- some proprietary compilers output boilerplate every time. Same
effect on libtool tests.
A third, similar problem
