RE: w32 ports of Libtool

2008-03-10 Thread Duft Markus
Hi Ralf, Peter! Peter Rosin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 02:53:20PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Peter, Markus, in order to give some perspective for both of your w32 ports of Libtool: when we make the switch to git as primary repo, we intend to import

Re: w32 ports of Libtool

2008-03-10 Thread Peter Rosin
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 08:50:16AM +0100, Duft Markus wrote: Peter Rosin wrote: On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 02:53:20PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Peter, Markus, in order to give some perspective for both of your w32 ports of Libtool: when we make the switch to git as primary repo

RE: w32 ports of Libtool

2008-03-10 Thread Duft Markus
Hi! Peter Rosin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 08:50:16AM +0100, Duft Markus wrote: [[...]] (minor notes for the wgcc patch: 1. I would drop the PARITY_CFLAGS variable and instead use symtab_cflags=$symtab_cflags -xc++ in the parity case for the

w32 ports of Libtool

2008-03-09 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Peter, Markus, in order to give some perspective for both of your w32 ports of Libtool: when we make the switch to git as primary repo, we intend to import your patch series in topic branches to allow for easier work and integration of them into the master tree (and to hopefully synchronize

Re: w32 ports of Libtool

2008-03-09 Thread Peter Rosin
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 02:53:20PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Peter, Markus, in order to give some perspective for both of your w32 ports of Libtool: when we make the switch to git as primary repo, we intend to import your patch series in topic branches to allow for easier work