Re: Pings

2009-01-29 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Akim, * Akim Demaille wrote on Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 04:43:56PM CET: Some of my patches are waiting for approvals or comments. I do understand that it requires time to process them, I just want to make sure they aren't forgotten :) Thanks for the reminder. I think I had them all on my

Re: Pings

2009-01-29 Thread Charles Wilson
Akim Demaille wrote: Le 29 janv. 09 à 19:22, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit : For this one I'd prefer if Charles and/or Peter took care of it, they have a bunch of changes in this area and some discussion going on. Actually, I'd prefer to just be able to say go! once y'all have agreed on a common

Re: Pings

2009-01-29 Thread Charles Wilson
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Akim Demaille wrote on Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 04:43:56PM CET: - nuke warnings in the wrappers The patch at the end of http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2008-12/msg00069.html For this one I'd prefer if Charles and/or Peter took care of it, they have a

Re: Pings

2009-01-29 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Charles, * Charles Wilson wrote on Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 05:34:08AM CET: See earlier reply in this thread for why we don't need to worry about any other magic MSVC macros. So, I think the only remaining cleanup-warnings patch for the cwrapper is this: diff --git

Pings

2009-01-28 Thread Akim Demaille
Hi friends, Some of my patches are waiting for approvals or comments. I do understand that it requires time to process them, I just want to make sure they aren't forgotten :) - dynamic logs http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2009-01/msg00064.html here I will probably make a