Re: preparing for 1.5.24

2007-04-25 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Charles, * Charles Wilson wrote on Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:38:49AM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >> Thanks also for the documentation suggestion. Slightly rewritten >> suggestion to come up. > > Ping? [antecedent reposted below] Sigh. I had hoped to have enough time to work on this. Alas

Re: preparing for 1.5.24

2007-04-24 Thread Charles Wilson
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Thanks also for the documentation suggestion. Slightly rewritten suggestion to come up. Ping? [antecedent reposted below] -- Chuck Around line 3546 [probably 4476, now] in libtool.texi, something like: --%< @emph{Wi

Re: preparing for 1.5.24

2007-03-18 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Charles, Please accept my apologies for the delay. * Charles Wilson wrote on Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 08:06:21PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > >I think the patch below should work, and be platform-agnostic. WDYT? > >OK for branch-1-5 and HEAD alike? It fixes the similar failure there. >

Re: preparing for 1.5.24

2007-02-18 Thread Charles Wilson
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Charles, Charles Wilson writes: - It would help me greatly if someone could look into the Cygwin and MinGW mdemo* failures; and documentation updates if needed. Solution in this case is to turn auto-export back on Or to mark all symbols as to be exported, no

Re: preparing for 1.5.24

2007-02-18 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Charles, Charles Wilson writes: - It would help me greatly if someone could look into the Cygwin and MinGW mdemo* failures; and documentation updates if needed. Solution in this case is to turn auto-export back on Or to mark all symbols as to be exported, no? (Or to mark all othe

Re: preparing for 1.5.24

2007-02-17 Thread Charles Wilson
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: I would like to release 1.5.24 as soon as possible. I've flushed my queue now, except for the patch I just posted and whatever w32 changes are still needed. FWIW, I've done a test run of branch-1-5, here's some results: PASS SKIP FAIL config.guess compi

Re: preparing for 1.5.24

2007-02-17 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Feb 17, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Peter, Tim, all, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:20:24PM CET: On Feb 11, 2007, at 7:24 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Should we rather do a real prerelease, so it's archived on alpha.gnu.org,[...] This is good news, and

Re: preparing for 1.5.24

2007-02-17 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, Tim, all, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:20:24PM CET: > On Feb 11, 2007, at 7:24 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > >Should we rather do a real prerelease, so it's archived on > >alpha.gnu.org,[...] > > This is good news, and great work. I'm pretty sure finch can handle

Re: preparing for 1.5.24

2007-02-12 Thread Tim Rice
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello libtoolers, > > I would like to release 1.5.24 as soon as possible. I've flushed my > queue now, except for the patch I just posted and whatever w32 changes > are still needed. > > To ensure that there are no regressions, I would like to annou

Re: preparing for 1.5.24

2007-02-11 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Feb 11, 2007, at 7:24 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello libtoolers, I would like to release 1.5.24 as soon as possible. I've flushed my queue now, except for the patch I just posted and whatever w32 changes are still needed. To ensure that there are no regressions, I would like to announce

preparing for 1.5.24

2007-02-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello libtoolers, I would like to release 1.5.24 as soon as possible. I've flushed my queue now, except for the patch I just posted and whatever w32 changes are still needed. To ensure that there are no regressions, I would like to announce a sort of prerelease. To make things simple, the easie