Hi Charles, Bruno,
* Charles Wilson wrote on Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 07:34:56AM CEST:
>
> Attached. Re-ran *all* of the tests described here:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2007-04/msg00073.html
> with identical results.
Thank you for patching and testing, and thanks to Bruno f
Thanks Noah. I installed that, but changed the constant to be a #define
in the header file.
To ease Jeff's concerns about -shared: if libtool supports shared
libraries for the system/compiler in question, then they will be
preferred over static libs. So -shared is not needed in order for the
tes
[ let's continue this discussion on libtool-patches, please ]
Hello Liviu, Vishal,
Could you please try this patch (written for both CVS HEAD and
branch-1-5), and post the --debug link output with the changed
libtool script? Thank you.
The patch is certainly not ready for prime time yet, as it
OK to apply? With this, if only `ChangeLog' (and `configure.ac' for
ltversion.in) are newer than the respective target, we avoid updating.
This fixes the bug where
touch $srcdir/libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh # or edit otherwise
would fail to update ltmain.sh and thus libtool.
This seems to more
