Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support

2008-08-12 Thread Peter Rosin
Peter Rosin skrev: Peter Rosin skrev: Ralf Wildenhues skrev: *snip* Please try the patch below for simplistic at-file support with $NM. While testing, I set nm_file_list_spec to '@' and always_export_symbols to yes on GNU/Linux, and saw no test failure, probably because my nm also

Re: [PATCH 370] Implement lt_dlopening of only preloaded modules.

2008-08-12 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 12:51:36PM CEST: * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, May 06, 2008 at 07:24:46PM CEST: * libltdl/m4/ltdl.m4 (LTDL_INIT): Check for a libltdl that provides lt_dladvise_preopen when deciding if installed libltdl is 'new enough'. *

Re: [PATCH 370] Implement lt_dlopening of only preloaded modules.

2008-08-12 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: This patch causes a testsuite failure on GNU/Linux. As a step toward stabilization, I would like to propose to revert the above patch. Its acceptance should rely on its test passing on at least more than one of Darwin, MinGW, GNU/Linux, and AIX.

Re: [PATCH 370] Implement lt_dlopening of only preloaded modules.

2008-08-12 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:27:07PM CEST: On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: OK to revert? Or, rather: does anybody have problems with the reversal? Temporarily or permanently? Ah, chucks. Incomplete research. I take the above back, for now, and brood over

More parallel make testsuite fixes.

2008-08-12 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Automake does not explicitly add dependencies for -dlopen and -dlpreopen libs. Also, Automake-generated makefiles are not safe for make -j all check (and other combinations of toplevel targets). This is difficult to fix within Automake without incurring quite a bit of redundancy; so ... This

Re: [PATCH 370] Implement lt_dlopening of only preloaded modules.

2008-08-12 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:27:07PM CEST: On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: OK to revert? Or, rather: does anybody have problems with the reversal? Temporarily or permanently? Ah, chucks. Incomplete research. I take the above back,

Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support

2008-08-12 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:38:45AM CEST: Peter Rosin skrev: It works to have it in LT_PATH_NM, so that's where I'd put it. Like the attached patch... That's a good idea. Also, I tested the patch on the new testsuite and with this patch I get the desired behaviour in the

Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support

2008-08-12 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 07:21:07AM CEST: Sorry for the delay. I pushed that patch to the msvc branch. 2008-08-13 Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Rosin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Support for response files with $NM. * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4

Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support

2008-08-12 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 09:47:28AM CEST: Ralf Wildenhues skrev: * Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 10:38:14AM CEST: Peter Rosin skrev: 16: duplicate_conv.at:25 duplicate convenience archive names MS link doesn't have reloadable objects (i.e. like ld -r).