On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote:
I'm pushing the patch with the diff below squashed in, hope you
don't mind.
Ralf, being as you're a dual libtool / GCC maintainer, what is the
process for getting libtool changes pushed to GCC? Do I just wait for
a
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote:
Thanks. The patch looks good to me, with only trivial nits:
the testsuite addition should be sorted under the 'libtool script
generation' banner rather than with the sysroot tests, and I don't
think that it is
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote:
This patch looks ok but it uses $pkg and $p which are not in Libtool's
name space, and it lacks updates to NEWS, libtool.texi, and the test
suite. Oh yes, the --enable-shared code has similar problems, but a
patch
Hi Ollie,
* Ollie Wild wrote on Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 06:32:08PM CEST:
Modify --with-pic to support per-package configurations.
* libltdl/m4/libtool.m4: Modify --with-pic to accept a list of
package names. Modelled off --enable-shared.
Peter, thanks for noticing the
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Ollie,
* Ollie Wild wrote on Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 06:32:08PM CEST:
Modify --with-pic to support per-package configurations.
* libltdl/m4/libtool.m4: Modify --with-pic to accept a list of
* Ollie Wild wrote on Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:55:36PM CET:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Ollie Wild wrote on Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 06:32:08PM CEST:
Modify --with-pic to support per-package configurations.
* libltdl/m4/libtool.m4: Modify
Hello Ollie,
* Ollie Wild wrote on Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 06:32:08PM CEST:
2010-10-21 Ollie Wild a...@google.com
Modify --with-pic to support per-package configurations.
* libltdl/m4/libtool.m4: Modify --with-pic to accept a list of
package names. Modelled off
Hi Ollie,
Den 2010-10-22 00:29 skrev Ollie Wild:
This is motivated by GCC. We compile Fortran shared libraries which
must execute on systems with no libgfortrans.so. The usual approach,
passing --with-pic to configure is undesirable because it reduces the
performance of other static
Den 2010-10-22 08:21 skrev Peter Rosin:
+ for pkg in $withval; do
No quotes *allowed*.
for pkg in $withval; do
If you have quotes here, isn't the changed IFS meaningless?
This is the issue that made me send the mail, the others are not really
important.
Oh, forgot to mention, the
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Ollie Wild a...@google.com wrote:
This is motivated by GCC. We compile Fortran shared libraries which
must execute on systems with no libgfortrans.so. The usual approach,
passing --with-pic to configure is undesirable because it reduces the
performance of
Hi Ollie,
Den 2010-10-22 18:32 skrev Ollie Wild:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Ollie Wild a...@google.com wrote:
2010-10-21 Ollie Wild a...@google.com
Modify --with-pic to support per-package configurations.
* libltdl/m4/libtool.m4: Modify --with-pic to accept a list of
On 10/22/2010 03:02 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
There is never any need to quote the right-hand side of assignments,
unless you have literal whitespace in them. If you do
a=foo; b= bar; c=$a$b; d=$c
both $c and $d will be foo bar.
See 'Shell Substitutions' in the 'Portable Shell' chapter in
12 matches
Mail list logo
