On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2012.12.10 11:39, Toby Gray wrote:
>> Using a special device sounds like a good idea, especially as there are
>> already a selection of different firmwares available. Is there a
>> particular pre-made board that contains a suitable PIC or AV
On 2012.12.10 11:39, Toby Gray wrote:
> Using a special device sounds like a good idea, especially as there are
> already a selection of different firmwares available. Is there a
> particular pre-made board that contains a suitable PIC or AVR chip that
> people would recommend?
I think Xiaofan, Tr
On 26/11/12 22:54, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2012.11.26 13:34, Toby Gray wrote:
>> Excellent. I'll try to find time to do some improvements and possibly
>> even add some tests which perform some IO. My thinking for tests which
>> require particular types of devices would be that they get marked as
>>
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2012.11.26 13:34, Toby Gray wrote:
>> Excellent. I'll try to find time to do some improvements and possibly
>> even add some tests which perform some IO. My thinking for tests which
>> require particular types of devices would be that they g
On 2012.11.26 13:34, Toby Gray wrote:
> Excellent. I'll try to find time to do some improvements and possibly
> even add some tests which perform some IO. My thinking for tests which
> require particular types of devices would be that they get marked as
> skipped if you don't have suitable devices
On 25/11/12 01:45, Pete Batard wrote:
> OK, the tests have now been pushed into mainline (as a single commit),
> along with the 2 other commits that I said I'd be pushing some time ago.
Excellent. I'll try to find time to do some improvements and possibly
even add some tests which perform some IO
OK, the tests have now been pushed into mainline (as a single commit),
along with the 2 other commits that I said I'd be pushing some time ago.
Toby: I renamed test_stress.c to stress.c, as I felt with the file
already residing in a tests/ subdirectory, it was a bit redundant, and I
applied som
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
>> I've also only added it to the Visual Studio 2005 build as I don't have
>> a copy of VC6 or VC2008 to test changes.
>
> No worries. At the risk of angering some people, I don't think it's
> worth spending any time on VC6 at this stage, as the
On 2012.11.22 11:06, Toby Gray wrote:
> I decided to go for a test directory as it turned into more than one file.
Fine with me. I'm not worried that much about where the code goes, as
long as the code is in.
> The current work in progress is on my (badly named) testing branch:
> https://github.
On 13/11/12 18:49, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> I would use a test/ directory for programs used for tests (stress test
> in this case).
> These stress test programs should NOT be used as example by our users.
> We should try to avoid possible confusion where we can.
>
> It can be the beginning of a
2012/11/13 Pete Batard
> On 2012.11.13 10:23, Toby Gray wrote:
> > I've been tempted to write a simple test application to do things
> > similar to this for a while now. Just a few for loops which call various
> > APIs many hundreds of times to help detect memory leaks.
>
> That would be nice. I
On 2012.11.13 07:32, Stefano Di Martino wrote:
> Via PyUSB I check every 2 seconds, if a usb device has been attached or
> dettached on a specific usb hub. After 32 times, I get the error
> "No such device (it may have been disconnected)".
>
> The developer of PyUSB said, that it may has to do som
On 2012.11.13 10:23, Toby Gray wrote:
> I've been tempted to write a simple test application to do things
> similar to this for a while now. Just a few for loops which call various
> APIs many hundreds of times to help detect memory leaks.
That would be nice. I see no issue adding such a test app
On 12/11/12 20:09, Pete Batard wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 2012.11.12 12:06, Stefano Di Martino wrote:
>> is this supposed to crash, when you don't free a list?
>>
>> for(i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
>> cnt = libusb_get_device_list(NULL, &devs);
>> if (cnt < 0)
>> return (int) cnt;
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:09:27 +
> Von: Pete Batard
> An: libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Libusbx-devel] Crashes
> 1. What is the exact version of libusbx you are using (should be
> something like 1.0.14.105
Hi Stefano,
On 2012.11.12 12:06, Stefano Di Martino wrote:
> is this supposed to crash, when you don't free a list?
>
> for(i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> cnt = libusb_get_device_list(NULL, &devs);
> if (cnt < 0)
> return (int) cnt;
> //if (i < 99)
> //libusb_free_device
16 matches
Mail list logo
