On 8/16/19 11:25 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>
>
> On 8/16/19 5:59 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> On 8/14/19 5:14 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>>> I've run make check with each individual patch, and everything
>>> seems fine in my environment.
>>>
>>> For all patches:
>>>
>>>
On 8/16/19 5:59 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 8/14/19 5:14 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
I've run make check with each individual patch, and everything
seems fine in my environment.
For all patches:
Tested-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza
I'll see if I can drop some code reviews later
On 8/14/19 5:14 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
I've run make check with each individual patch, and everything
seems fine in my environment.
For all patches:
Tested-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza
I'll see if I can drop some code reviews later on.
That'd be great because we are lacking
I've run make check with each individual patch, and everything
seems fine in my environment.
For all patches:
Tested-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza
I'll see if I can drop some code reviews later on.
Thanks,
DHB
On 8/14/19 8:57 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Kernel structure looks slightly
Kernel structure looks slightly different than what virpcimock creates.
This did not use to be a problem, because we are testing KVM device
assignment even though majority of systems we run on (if not all of
them) use VFIO assignment.
In order to switch our test suite (mainly virhostdevtest and
