Re: [libxml-devel] 0.4.0 development

2006-10-30 Thread Doug Bryant
Ross, It's working good for me so far.  The xml merging problem has disappeared in my application and performance is on par with the previous version.  I have not done any performance benchmarks, but it does not feel any slower than before. Thanks for all your hard work on this project.DougOn 10/28

Re: [libxml-devel] cdata comment patch

2006-10-30 Thread Ross Bamford
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:27:02 +0100, Luc Van Deuren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just needed #CDATA and comment into my xml output. > making a cdata or comment node did not seem to work, > so i made a quick patch, (cdata_comment_patch.zip) > Thanks, this is now applied in DEV_0_4. Sorry it to

Re: [libxml-devel] Return value of XML::Node#<

2006-10-30 Thread Ross Bamford
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:56:17 -, Masashi Shimbo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed that libxml-ruby 0.3.8's method XML::Node#<<(child) > returns 'child' instead of 'self'. > Okay, this is now fixed up in DEV_0_4. Thanks again, -- Ross Bamford - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[libxml-devel] Win32 compatibility

2006-10-30 Thread Ross Bamford
Hi, Is anyone out there successfully using libxml-ruby on Win32? I _was_ pretty sure the answer was 'yes' but I still see a few people in the forums and on blogs saying that they just can't get it to work. The problem is, I really don't have the facilities (i.e. an available win32 machine)

Re: [libxml-devel] 0.4.0 development

2006-10-30 Thread Ross Bamford
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:38:36 -, Doug Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ross, > > It's working good for me so far. The xml merging problem has > disappeared in > my application and performance is on par with the previous version. I > have > not done any performance benchmarks, but it