We are using some code that utilizes libxml and creates XML
documents. Using 0.9.5 everything is fine. Using 0.9.6 or 0.9.7, the
more we use this code, the higher our memory usage gets.
Seems likely that a memory leak was introduced in 0.9.6. We are
seeing this same behavior on OS X and Gentoo.
Hi Joseph,
We are using some code that utilizes libxml and creates XML
documents. Using 0.9.5 everything is fine. Using 0.9.6 or 0.9.7, the
more we use this code, the higher our memory usage gets.
Seems likely that a memory leak was introduced in 0.9.6. We are
seeing this same behavior on O
This is likely a PEBKAC issue rather than a bug. I hope I'm submitting
to the right list.
I'm getting different validation results from libxml in Ruby than I am
from a command-line tool (xmllint). I'm using a schema definition from
ASTM to validate the output, for what it cost me the schema sho
On Jan 7, 1:08 pm, Charlie Savage wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> > We are using some code that utilizes libxml and creates XML
> > documents. Using 0.9.5 everything is fine. Using 0.9.6 or 0.9.7, the
> > more we use this code, the higher our memory usage gets.
>
> > Seems likely that a memory leak wa
On Jan 7, 1:38 pm, Joseph Palermo wrote:
> On Jan 7, 1:08 pm, Charlie Savage wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Joseph,
>
> > > We are using some code that utilizes libxml and creates XML
> > > documents. Using 0.9.5 everything is fine. Using 0.9.6 or 0.9.7, the
> > > more we use this code, the higher our m
Hi Joseph,
I'll see if I can put something together, we know it's in the
to_solr_doc from acts_as_solr somewhere.
Looks like the problem is in to_s on Node
1.times do
node = XML::Node.new 'node'
node.to_s
end
Nice work - that's a great test case.
So if I I run this code:
1000.
Looks like the problem is in to_s on Node
1.times do
node = XML::Node.new 'node'
node.to_s
end
Anyway, will have to look and see if there is anything obvious in the
part of the bindings.
And fixed in trunk. It was caused by the addition of encoding support
in the last couple of
On Jan 7, 4:06 pm, Charlie Savage wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> >> I'll see if I can put something together, we know it's in the
> >> to_solr_doc from acts_as_solr somewhere.
>
> > Looks like the problem is in to_s on Node
>
> > 1.times do
> > node = XML::Node.new 'node'
> > node.to_s
> > end
2009/1/7 Charlie Savage :
> Hi Joseph,
>
>>> I'll see if I can put something together, we know it's in the
>>> to_solr_doc from acts_as_solr somewhere.
>>
>> Looks like the problem is in to_s on Node
>>
>> 1.times do
>> node = XML::Node.new 'node'
>> node.to_s
>> end
>
> Nice work - that's a
Hey Aaron,
Looks like the xmlOutputBufferPtr never gets freed.
Yup, exactly right. I posted a fix to trunk and sent another email to
the list, but somehow it never made it through.
Index: ext/libxml/ruby_xml_node.c
===
--- ex
10 matches
Mail list logo
