Re: Fwd: Apple GCC source code license (APSL)

2003-01-28 Thread David Johnson
On Monday 27 January 2003 11:33 pm, James Michael DuPont wrote: The cvs does require accepting the license hence my question. I think that's because the repository has code under multiple licenses, one of which is the APSL. They aren't claiming that everything in that repository is under the

Re: Fwd: Apple GCC source code license (APSL)

2003-01-28 Thread Andy Tai
After a try more than 10 years ago, Steve Jobs does not dare to do it again. --- James Michael DuPont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a question about the APSL : http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/ So, that means that the gcc changes are no longer under the gpl, but under the APSL?

Re: Fwd: Apple GCC source code license (APSL)

2003-01-28 Thread James Michael DuPont
David, thanks for you comments and help. Not understanding too much about lawyer, I get easily confused by these issues. Thanks again, mike --- David Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 27 January 2003 11:33 pm, James Michael DuPont wrote: The cvs does require accepting the license