On Monday 27 January 2003 11:33 pm, James Michael DuPont wrote:
The cvs does require accepting the license hence my question.
I think that's because the repository has code under multiple licenses, one of
which is the APSL. They aren't claiming that everything in that repository is
under the
After a try more than 10 years ago, Steve Jobs does
not dare to do it again.
--- James Michael DuPont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question about the APSL :
http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/
So, that means that the gcc changes are no longer
under the gpl, but
under the APSL?
David,
thanks for you comments and help.
Not understanding too much about lawyer, I get easily confused by these
issues.
Thanks again,
mike
--- David Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 27 January 2003 11:33 pm, James Michael DuPont wrote:
The cvs does require accepting the license
3 matches
Mail list logo