On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, David Johnson wrote:
On Sunday 02 June 2002 02:28 pm, Michael Bauer wrote:
That's certainly a start but actually copying is less of an issue. The
concerns are more with what can be done with this software (a kind of a
SETI at home software). Thoughts?
So you
such licenses thought as Draconian as Microsoft's?
--
--
Michael Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.michaelbauer.com
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
think this too would restrict the ability to fork the code.
--
--
Michael Bauer[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.michaelbauer.com
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
So, is the algorithm patented as well as copyrighted? If so, I think
another can of worms is about to have the top popped off.
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Randy Kramer wrote:
Michael Bauer wrote:
I don't think copyright protects an algorithm. I think you'd need a
patent for that. So, I don't
Ah, a most excellent and enlightening article, Rick. Thank you.
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Rick Moen wrote:
Quoting Michael Bauer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On the other hand, I always thought forking code was a bad thing.
Not really.
http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/essays/forking.html
--
license
.
--
--
Michael Bauer[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.michaelbauer.com
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
6 matches
Mail list logo