Re: EULAs

2002-06-02 Thread Michael Bauer
On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, David Johnson wrote: On Sunday 02 June 2002 02:28 pm, Michael Bauer wrote: That's certainly a start but actually copying is less of an issue. The concerns are more with what can be done with this software (a kind of a SETI at home software). Thoughts? So you

EULAs

2002-06-01 Thread Michael Bauer
such licenses thought as Draconian as Microsoft's? -- -- Michael Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.michaelbauer.com -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

Re: open source licenses and algorithms

2002-01-21 Thread Michael Bauer
think this too would restrict the ability to fork the code. -- -- Michael Bauer[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.michaelbauer.com -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

Re: open source licenses and algorithms

2002-01-21 Thread Michael Bauer
So, is the algorithm patented as well as copyrighted? If so, I think another can of worms is about to have the top popped off. On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Randy Kramer wrote: Michael Bauer wrote: I don't think copyright protects an algorithm. I think you'd need a patent for that. So, I don't

Re: open source licenses and algorithms

2002-01-21 Thread Michael Bauer
Ah, a most excellent and enlightening article, Rick. Thank you. On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Rick Moen wrote: Quoting Michael Bauer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): On the other hand, I always thought forking code was a bad thing. Not really. http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/essays/forking.html -- license

Re: Advertising Clauses in Licenses

2002-01-20 Thread Michael Bauer
. -- -- Michael Bauer[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.michaelbauer.com -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3