Luis Villa l...@tieguy.org writes:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Luis Villa l...@tieguy.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Engel Nyst engel.n...@gmail.com wrote:
A little off, another cosmetic point: I cannot find Mozilla Public
License 1.1 linked anywhere, except the page with MPL
* Luis Villa l...@tieguy.org [2013-01-03 08:27]:
Very very minor nitpick is there should be an extra break before the
Popular Licenses header to make the whitespace look even with the other
blocks of text...at least for the way it renders in my browsers (safari
and firefox).
Sigh, I was
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Luis Villa l...@tieguy.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Engel Nyst engel.n...@gmail.com wrote:
A little off, another cosmetic point: I cannot find Mozilla Public
License 1.1 linked anywhere, except the page with MPL 1.0 text. Am I
missing it, or is
Hello license-discuss,
Thank you for the work and patience on this. IMHO the new page looks
more useful than it used to be.
Cosmetic point: two of the licenses have explicit version, while the
others don't. Is this intended?
A little off, another cosmetic point: I cannot find Mozilla Public
On 03/01/13 14:19, Engel Nyst wrote:
A little off, another cosmetic point: I cannot find Mozilla Public
License 1.1 linked anywhere, except the page with MPL 1.0 text.
The canonical URL for any link anyone is creating is:
http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/1.1/
Gerv
Happy New year!
The new landing page looks good.
Very very minor nitpick is there should be an extra break before the
Popular Licenses header to make the whitespace look even with the other
blocks of text...at least for the way it renders in my browsers (safari
and firefox).
Regards,
Nigel
On
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Engel Nyst engel.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello license-discuss,
Thank you for the work and patience on this. IMHO the new page looks
more useful than it used to be.
Cosmetic point: two of the licenses have explicit version, while the
others don't. Is this
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Tzeng, Nigel H. nigel.tz...@jhuapl.edu wrote:
Happy New year!
The new landing page looks good.
Very very minor nitpick is there should be an extra break before the
Popular Licenses header to make the whitespace look even with the other
blocks of text...at
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Luis Villa l...@tieguy.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Engel Nyst engel.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello license-discuss,
Thank you for the work and patience on this. IMHO the new page looks
more useful than it used to be.
Cosmetic point: two of the
Hi, license-discuss:
Based on the discussions we've had here over the second half of 2012,
I've published a revised version of opensource.org/licenses this
morning.
A few minor tweaks were made to the last draft based on comments here;
the biggest being a reference to the FAQ and inclusion of
Luis Villa l...@tieguy.org writes:
Based on the discussions we've had here over the second half of 2012,
I've published a revised version of opensource.org/licenses this
morning.
A few minor tweaks were made to the last draft based on comments here;
the biggest being a reference to the FAQ and
11 matches
Mail list logo
