Come on Eric, laugh at yourself a little. I'm just yanking your chain
because you make yourself such an easy target.
E
ps. Thats quite a check you are writing when you say you want *win* more than
RMS _ever_ has.
pps. I'll give you $20 if you'll stop saying "tribe".
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at
Ean R . Schuessler wrote:
> Come on Eric, laugh at yourself a little. I'm just yanking your chain
> because you make yourself such an easy target.
I agree. That last tirade against Richard was just a little bit much.
I think Eric deserves praise for all his work, and also believe that
it helpful
Ean R . Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Come on Eric, laugh at yourself a little. I'm just yanking your chain
>because you make yourself such an easy target.
Yeah. Well, when you pull my chain, don't complain because I bite.
> ps. Thats quite a check you are writing when you say you want *wi
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>I would have preferred that outcome. Turns out I'm *very* good at
>this bullshit; good enough that high-powered professional PR types
>call me a "natural" and I've seen at least one serious semiotic study
>of my propaganda technique (in Feed magazine
Well, I hate to get down to this level, but it seems I've been beaten
to it.
Look who's got tickets on himself.
You really are such a joke Eric, maybe if you could see past your own
self-gratifying bull you'd be able to see that. You may be surprised
to know that the sort of spirit that drives
I agree with Richard that GNOME should be classified of part of the
Free Software movement. We started this project to provide a free (in
the sense of freedom) user interface for the GNU project.
We are not working on GNOME because it is "economically" a good idea,
nor for any of the allegedly
Miguel de Icaza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> A problem I have with OpenSource these days is the following: even if
> these days Qt passes as OpenSource, it is really annoying for
> developers. All of these "opensource" licenses that have started
> appearing are nothing but a big nuisance.
I agree with
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> I agree with Richard that GNOME should be classified of part of the Free
> Software movement.
I'm glad you said something -- I almost jumped in, but I'm not involved with
Gnome.
> We are not working on GNOME because it is "economically" a good idea,
s Gersh wrote:
>
> unsubscribe
*growling*
Ten second head start.
--
Signal 11, List BOFH and sysadmin of malign.net
Runs with scissors. | people.mn.mediaone.net/bojay/
RMS wrote:
>How do Open Source projects differ from the above?
>In two very important ways. Firstly, OSPs have no
>time-bound. That is, there is no deadline whereby
>the next version of GNOME has to be delivered, "or
>
>I agree entirely with your argument, but the words raise a b
10 matches
Mail list logo
