I agree with Richard that GNOME should be classified of part of the
Free Software movement. We started this project to provide a free (in
the sense of freedom) user interface for the GNU project.
We are not working on GNOME because it is "economically" a good idea,
nor for any of the allegedly development benefits of open source, but
because of the freedom issues involved in this.
A problem I have with OpenSource these days is the following: even if
these days Qt passes as OpenSource, it is really annoying for
developers. All of these "opensource" licenses that have started
appearing are nothing but a big nuisance.
They do not enable me to reuse code between different projects. The
crazy idea of cut-and-pasting is no longer possible between these
projects.
There is a nice study of this here:
http://pmitros.mit.edu/patchwork.html
Best wishes,
Miguel.
- RFC soon on essay "Does Free Software Production i... Jacques Chester
- Re: RFC soon on essay "Does Free Software Pro... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: RFC soon on essay "Does Free Software... mark
- Re: RFC soon on essay "Does Free Soft... Signal 11
- Re: RFC soon on essay "Does Free ... Richard Stallman
- Re: RFC soon on essay "Does ... John Cowan
- Re: RFC soon on essay "D... Ean R . Schuessler
- Re: RFC soon on essay &qu... Miguel de Icaza
- Re: RFC soon on essay &qu... Csaba Szigetvari
- Re: RFC soon on essay "D... Richard Stallman
- Re: RFC soon on essay &qu... Miguel de Icaza
- Re: RFC soon on essay &qu... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: RFC soon on essay &qu... Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: RFC soon on essay &qu... Richard Stallman
- Re: RFC soon on essay &qu... Paul Crowley
- Re: RFC soon on essay &qu... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: RFC soon on essay &qu... Miguel de Icaza
- Re: RFC soon on essay &qu... Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: RFC soon on essay "Does Free Soft... Miguel de Icaza
- Re: RFC soon on essay "Does Free Software Pro... Jacques Chester

