Ean R . Schuessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Frankly Richard, I agree. You should be more of a sport. Think of the
benefits you would recieve. Look at all your other colleagues that
grew rich while you were splitting these philosophical hairs. Its not
too late! If you "play ball" the establishment
A complete free operating system *of sufficiently high quality*
(not the highest possible quality, but better than Windows, anyway).
Otherwise, any old hack would have done the job.
I agree it helps a lot to have high-quality software.
But even a somewhat unreliable operating system
Come on Eric, laugh at yourself a little. I'm just yanking your chain
because you make yourself such an easy target.
E
ps. Thats quite a check you are writing when you say you want *win* more than
RMS _ever_ has.
pps. I'll give you $20 if you'll stop saying "tribe".
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999
Ean R . Schuessler wrote:
Come on Eric, laugh at yourself a little. I'm just yanking your chain
because you make yourself such an easy target.
I agree. That last tirade against Richard was just a little bit much.
I think Eric deserves praise for all his work, and also believe that
it helpful
Ean R . Schuessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Come on Eric, laugh at yourself a little. I'm just yanking your chain
because you make yourself such an easy target.
Yeah. Well, when you pull my chain, don't complain because I bite.
ps. Thats quite a check you are writing when you say you want *win*
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
I agree with Richard that GNOME should be classified of part of the Free
Software movement.
I'm glad you said something -- I almost jumped in, but I'm not involved with
Gnome.
We are not working on GNOME because it is "economically" a good idea,
RMS wrote:
How do Open Source projects differ from the above?
In two very important ways. Firstly, OSPs have no
time-bound. That is, there is no deadline whereby
the next version of GNOME has to be delivered, "or
I agree entirely with your argument, but the words raise a
7 matches
Mail list logo
