A complete free operating system *of sufficiently high quality*
(not the highest possible quality, but better than Windows, anyway).
Otherwise, any old hack would have done the job.
I agree it helps a lot to have high-quality software.
But even a somewhat unreliable operating system is a lot better
than no operating system. In 1984, there was no operating system
which respected our freedom. To have at least one which does
is a big step forward for freedom.
The fact that it has pretty good quality is a nice bonus ;-).
- RFC soon on essay "Does Free Software Production i... Jacques Chester
- Re: RFC soon on essay "Does Free Software Pro... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: RFC soon on essay "Does Free Software... mark
- Re: RFC soon on essay "Does Free Soft... Signal 11
- Re: RFC soon on essay "Does Free ... Richard Stallman
- Re: RFC soon on essay "Does ... John Cowan
- Re: RFC soon on essay "D... Ean R . Schuessler
- Re: RFC soon on essay &qu... Miguel de Icaza
- Re: RFC soon on essay &qu... Csaba Szigetvari
- Re: RFC soon on essay "D... Richard Stallman
- Re: RFC soon on essay &qu... Miguel de Icaza
- Re: RFC soon on essay &qu... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: RFC soon on essay &qu... Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: RFC soon on essay &qu... Richard Stallman
- Re: RFC soon on essay &qu... Paul Crowley
- Re: RFC soon on essay &qu... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: RFC soon on essay &qu... Miguel de Icaza
- Re: RFC soon on essay &qu... Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: RFC soon on essay "Does Free Soft... Miguel de Icaza
- Re: RFC soon on essay "Does Free Software Pro... Jacques Chester

