Re: testing kit conformance as a condition of distribution

rapid enhancement of the feature set. By specifying that unofficial modified versions lose their certification, we prevent confusion about the brand. In other words: not requiring certification speeds up improvements, without hurting the brand. HTH, ~ESP -- Evan Prodromou [EMAIL

[Off-topic] open-source-debate (was Re: Dual licensing)

/. Freelists is a great service, by the way. They host discussions about Open Source software and Open Content free of charge, and they use Open Source software to do it. -- Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wikitravel - http://wikitravel.org/en/ The free, complete, up-to-date and reliable world

Re: Creative Commons Attribution

EP == Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: EP So, the Creative Commons licenses are not OSI-approved: EP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ EP I think there are two licenses that meet the Open Source EP Definition: the Attribution license: EP http

Creative Commons Attribution

-compatible? ~ESP * Creative Commons has a suite of licenses, with mix-and-match license elements. -- Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wikitravel - http://wikitravel.org/en/ The free, complete, up-to-date and reliable world-wide travel guide -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin

Re: Creative Commons Attribution

made of the original work is required. ~ESP -- Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wikitravel - http://wikitravel.org/en/ The free, complete, up-to-date and reliable world-wide travel guide -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

Re: Which license to use for MFC based software?

. Anyways, I'm probably just stating the obvious, but I figured somebody should. ~ESP -- Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wikitravel - http://wikitravel.org/en/ The free, complete, up-to-date and reliable world-wide travel guide -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

Open Content licenses

for non-software works would be dismissed out of hand, or would be considered. And, if they'd be considered, would they be considered only for their applicability to software, or for other works as well? Thanks, ~ESP -- Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wikitravel - http://www.wikitravel.org

Proprietary software at opensource.org

available, I find it weird that OSI isn't eating its own dogfood here with some real Open Source mailing list software. I'm sorry if this is a FAQ; I just figured it was worth noting. ~ESP -- Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wikitravel - http://www.wikitravel.org/ The free, complete, up-to-date