I have significantly modified the license. I apologize for not making
these changes before sending my original request for approval. These
changes were necessary however. I am going up against big business and
simply needed to clarify a few things and add a few added protections to
the license.
[My apologies if you receive this twice; I thought I sent it in text
format the first time...]
This is a formal request that the OSI Board approve the license I have
created, the Simplified Artistic License. I have patiently listened to
all feedback regarding this license and adjusted it
Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M. writes:
I understand the desire to develop of a habit and practice that
might
ultimately impact the resolution of legal rights in the
somewhat-distant
future, but I do not understand the persistent inclination to ignore
how
courts have viewed these issues in the
,
outdated?
Refer to the original post with this same subject line.
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 8:38 PM
To: Robert Samuel White
Subject: Re: Simplified Artistic License [osd]
To Robert Samuel White,
From: Robert
believe that this discussion has long reached its
usefulness and should be ended now.
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence E. Rosen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 3:45 PM
To: 'Robert Samuel White'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Simplified Artistic License [osd
Thank you, Bruce. I too think my license is better for having gone
through this process, and I am very grateful.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 1:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Robert Samuel White'; 'Russell Nelson'
Cc
Guys, it's no biggie...really!
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 12:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Robert Samuel White'; 'Russell Nelson'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License
feedback. I'd appreciate
it...
Thanks!
eNetwizard Content Management Server License
(Simplified Artistic License)
Preamble
Copyright Robert Samuel White, 1998-2002. All Rights Reserved.
The intent of this document is to state the conditions under which
eNetwizard Content Management
]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 9:46 AM
To: OSI License Discussion
Cc: Robert Samuel White
Subject: Re: Simplified Artistic License
To OSI License Discussion subscribers and Robert Samuel White,
I have read the Simplified Artistic License. Robert, it mostly complies
with the OSD, although I would
(Simplified Artistic License)
Preamble
Copyright Robert Samuel White, 1998-2002. All Rights Reserved.
The intent of this document is to state the conditions under which
eNetwizard Content Management Server (Package), and derivatives of
that collection of files created through textual modification
associated specifically with my product. That's
very important to me...
It's not important to us. Reducing the number of redundant licenses is.
--
-russ nelson http://russnelson.com |
-Original Message-
From: Robert Samuel White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday
If it would please Russ, and the OSI, then I propose accepting a
template of my license, which could be called the Simplified Artistic
License. I believe that there is a need for it, for several reasons:
(1) the Artistic License has some archaic conditions within it, (2) it
has too many
If it would please Russ, and the OSI, then I propose accepting a
template of my license, which could be called the Simplified Artistic
License. I believe that there is a need for it, for several reasons:
(1) the Artistic License has some archaic conditions within it, (2) it
has too many
Dear Russ,
I can understand your point of view, I just wonder if you can see mine?
I am an artist. I develop software, and that's what I love doing. I
also love offering it to others, but I want to maintain some semblance
of artistic control over my software. It's like my baby, after all.
To: Robert Samuel White
Subject: RE: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application
Server)
Robert Samuel White writes:
Russ, some of the conditions set forth within my license are unique
to
my license and cannot be found in any other license.
And for good reason. I just noticed
it still does to some, but for others, and not just I, its
place has come to pass. As an artist, I would like to use an artistic
license. I don't need my license to be the Robert Samuel White
License -- approving the license as a template allows any one to use
the same artistic license
I agree with you, Lewis. That is selfish of me to say you cannot sell
my free software.
I'll take that out of the license right now.
I still want to see my license approved because I think there is a need
for it. I think it would even serve the needs of Henry Piffers, who
just asked a
, 2002 5:01 PM
To: Robert Samuel White
Subject: RE: Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise)
Robert Samuel White writes:
There are some things I like about the Academic Free License, then
there
are many things that I do not like... Do you really want me to go
into
it?
Yes
.
-Samuel
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence E. Rosen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 6:33 PM
To: 'Robert Samuel White'; 'Russell Nelson'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Glenn Randers-Pehrson'; 'Bruce
Perens'
Subject: RE: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License
to hear your feedback on this. What do you
suggest?
eNetwizard Content Application Server License
(Modified Artistic License)
Preamble
Copyright Robert Samuel White, 1998-2002. All Rights Reserved.
The intent of this document is to state the conditions under which
eNetwizard Content Application
Samuel White
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content
Application Server)
Robert Samuel White wrote:
I agree that this should be changed; distributors of modified versions
should
be able to disclaim their liability as well.
(some semantic hair
Mahesh,
I do not believe technically that the configuration wizard would suffice
for the legal purposes the click-wrap is designed for... I believe this
because you must first install the package on your system (it must be
running on the server) before you can actually access the configuration
Robert Samuel White, 1998-2002. All Rights Reserved.
The intent of this document is to state the conditions under which
eNetwizard Content Application Server (Package) may be copied, such
that the author, Robert Samuel White (Copyright Holder), maintains
some semblance of artistic control over
I took the disclaimer directly from the PHP License.
Original message
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 20:25:09 +0530
From: Mahesh T Pai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard
Content Application Server)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Robert Samuel White
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY ROBERT SAMUEL WHITE AS IS' AND ANY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE
ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL ROBERT SAMUEL WHITE OR ANY OF HIS
CONTRIBUTORS
Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 2:13 AM
To: OSI License Discussion
Subject: Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content
Application Server)
To OSI License Discussion subscribers,
From: Robert Samuel White [EMAIL PROTECTED],
I have updated
to comply with.
4.
You are welcome to post my license to the license-discuss list with my
identification
ATT.
eNetwizard Content Application Server License
(Modified Artistic License)
Preamble
Copyright Robert Samuel White, 1998-2002. All Rights Reserved.
The intent of this document
27 matches
Mail list logo
