Re: [License-discuss] OSI equivalent

se-discuss@opensource.org>> > Subject: Re: [License-discuss] OSI equivalent > > On 15/02/17 16:58, Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) wrote: > > Does OSI have a license compatibility chart for the various approved > > licenses? > > I would have thought that a

Re: [License-discuss] OSI equivalent

Quoting Simon Phipps (webm...@opensource.org): > There are certainly list members who are keen for us all to believe > that without too much question. Fortunately, a comfortable amount of difference does exist between discussing of law in abstract terms -- even in great detail as to its

Re: [License-discuss] OSI equivalent

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:17 PM, David Woolley wrote: > On 15/02/17 16:58, Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) wrote: > >> Does OSI have a license compatibility chart for the various approved >> licenses? >> > > I would have thought that any such document would

Re: [License-discuss] OSI equivalent

On 15/02/17 16:58, Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) wrote: Does OSI have a license compatibility chart for the various approved licenses? I would have thought that any such document would constitute legal advice, which is illegal for half the list members to provide, and the other

Re: [License-discuss] OSI equivalent

> On Feb 15, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) > wrote: > > Does OSI have a license compatibility chart for the various approved > licenses? > Something similar to https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html ? Our > researchers are

[License-discuss] OSI equivalent

Does OSI have a license compatibility chart for the various approved licenses? Something similar to https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html ? Our researchers are pulling in code from all kinds of sources, and we want to keep them out of legal hot water, and a compatibility chart would