Dear Gabe, Dennis, John, Frank,
Thanks a lot for the info about OpenContent and OSWG. In fact, I'm not so much of a
software guy, and I think these were exactly the people I was looking for.
However, I'm a bit reluctant about OpenContent, particularly when a publisher can
block other paper
). There as well we have a risk of things being monopolized with
all its well-known consequences.
So I took some time over the Christmas holidays and adapted some Open Source documents
to the concept of Open Information, which could be actually a generalization of the
Open Source concept. I attach
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I took some time over the Christmas holidays and adapted some Open Source
documents to the concept of Open Information,
Consider coordinating your efforts with Open Content
(http://www.opencontent.org), which has an Open Content license.
--
Schlingt dreifach
Gabe Wachob wrote:
But the realities are different for different types of material.
I agree. In particular, though, documentation of software should
be licensed the same as the software, so that the two can be updated
in parallel. It is little use being able to change a program,
if you have
4 matches
Mail list logo
