I have noticed that a lot of the discussion occurring is on section 7
of the GPL license; so I feel the need to alleviate those concerns and
tell you outright that what I am considering for my SaaS Startup.
I.e.: FreeBSD license with two added provisions:
1. Badgeware (as you call it)
Dear all,
GPL v2 and v3 have anti-patent clauses that says, in effect, that if
anyone arranges a patent license for distribution of the code, they
have to arrange that license for all possible downstream recipients of
the code and derivatives.
I would like to take this one step further so that
John Funnell wrote:
I would like to take this one step further so that the anti-patent
clause covers use as well as distribution. I propose the license
below, a BSD derivative.
My understanding is that US copyright law doesn't restrict use of
software (UK law does). If that is correct, you
ldr ldr scripsit:
1. Badgeware (as you call it) requirement, i.e.: that every page of
the site and mobile-apps' have a copyright area which contains:
Powered by [project name](github.com/projectname) or
Powered by [new project name]() a fork of [project
name](github.com/projectname
You have
I am not a lawyer, this is not legal advice, etc. But I am under the
impression that in the USA there is precedent saying that incidental
copies that are necessary for use in a temporary medium (eg RAM) are
not considered fixed and are therefore allowed under copyright law.
If so, then any
John: I'd be happy with proprietary forks, as long as the Attribution
provision would hold.
E.g.: if they sell it to other people, those other people still are
aware of my original project and have a link to it
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 3:36 AM, John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org wrote:
ldr ldr
On 24 December 2012 22:10, ldr ldr stackoverflowuse...@gmail.com wrote:
John: I'd be happy with proprietary forks, as long as the Attribution
provision would hold.
E.g.: if they sell it to other people, those other people still are
aware of my original project and have a link to it
Aren't
You know what, I think I am!
Thank you so much, this is the reason I joined the license-discuss
mailing-list =D
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
On 24 December 2012 22:10, ldr ldr stackoverflowuse...@gmail.com wrote:
John: I'd be happy with proprietary
8 matches
Mail list logo
