On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 10:19:28AM +0900, Jon Keating wrote:
> Well, this Tuesday at 2000 GMT+9 I will be home if you want to meet on
> #Licq to discuss this in more details. I've been pretty busy lately,
I'm sorry, but I will have to reschedule the meeting. I'm taking the day
off from work tomorr
On Saturday 01 April 2006 03:29, Jon Keating wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 10:50:39PM +0200, Martin Garbe wrote:
> > A wiki is a good idea but I think many people don't know what to write
> > there.
> > What were the reasons to create this wiki? What should be organised
> > there?
>
> It was cr
Am Freitag, 31. März 2006 10:46 schrieb Arne Schmitz:
> Am Freitag, 31. März 2006 07:19 schrieb Jon Keating:
> > Hmm. I guess the reason that this hasn't been fixed is that it works for
> > me, and no one really complained about it being a big problem. If you
> > have GPGME setup and working correc
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 10:50:39PM +0200, Martin Garbe wrote:
> First I thought about implementing the encryption as plugin. But later I
> saw that this is not possible. So I needed to make the changes in the
> base code.
> The encryption code as plugin would be very good. The aim should be to
> mi
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 04:32:13PM +0200, QnD [Joachim Staib] wrote:
> good to know that I'm not the only one who is "a bit stressed" with the
> current licq :)
Well, I have been stressing over it for awhile, but just didnt have
the motivation to do to it all by myself.
> With the "least common d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Keating wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 05:36:44AM +0200, QnD [Joachim Staib] wrote:
>
>
>>- Things seem to be so unorganized. There are big steps to do, for example
>>better plugin integration, video support, bug hunting and what comes
>>
Hi Jon,
good to know that I'm not the only one who is "a bit stressed" with the
current licq :)
With the "least common denominator" I mean that every IM which can handle
multiple protocols only supports what all have in common, leaving out the
things that are important to decide for a specific p
Am Freitag, 31. März 2006 07:19 schrieb Jon Keating:
> Hmm. I guess the reason that this hasn't been fixed is that it works for
> me, and no one really complained about it being a big problem. If you have
> GPGME setup and working correctly, it works pretty easily.
Works for me, too. No problems s
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 05:36:44AM +0200, QnD [Joachim Staib] wrote:
> It all started some days ago when I tried to include GPG-support in icqnd (a
> gtk-gui for Licq). Because I don't have any knowledge about GPG I wanted to
> take a look at the qt-gui first to see how it works. I was more than
>
