Am Freitag, 31. März 2006 07:19 schrieb Jon Keating:
> Hmm. I guess the reason that this hasn't been fixed is that it works for
> me, and no one really complained about it being a big problem. If you have
> GPGME setup and working correctly, it works pretty easily.
Works for me, too. No problems s
Am Donnerstag, 30. März 2006 16:01 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Log:
> Fix uploading our info to the server, it's not perfect but works... for the
> most part. Unfortunately, even ICQ5 doesnt work perfectly for some reason.
>
> Add some more debugging output to the encoding error messages.
I now g
Hi Jon,
good to know that I'm not the only one who is "a bit stressed" with the
current licq :)
With the "least common denominator" I mean that every IM which can handle
multiple protocols only supports what all have in common, leaving out the
things that are important to decide for a specific p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Keating wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 05:36:44AM +0200, QnD [Joachim Staib] wrote:
>
>
>>- Things seem to be so unorganized. There are big steps to do, for example
>>better plugin integration, video support, bug hunting and what comes
>>
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 04:32:13PM +0200, QnD [Joachim Staib] wrote:
> good to know that I'm not the only one who is "a bit stressed" with the
> current licq :)
Well, I have been stressing over it for awhile, but just didnt have
the motivation to do to it all by myself.
> With the "least common d
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 10:50:39PM +0200, Martin Garbe wrote:
> First I thought about implementing the encryption as plugin. But later I
> saw that this is not possible. So I needed to make the changes in the
> base code.
> The encryption code as plugin would be very good. The aim should be to
> mi
