[Lift] Re: scalac java compilation

2009-01-13 Thread Josh Suereth
Yes, see the inline response On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Meredith Gregory wrote: > Josh, > > Thanks for the response. Just to be clear, is the plugin in question the > one listed below? What is the configuration that gets me the 2.8 version? > > Best wishes, > > --greg > > > org.sca

[Lift] Re: scalac java compilation

2009-01-13 Thread Meredith Gregory
Josh, Thanks for the response. Just to be clear, is the plugin in question the one listed below? What is the configuration that gets me the 2.8 version? Best wishes, --greg org.scala-tools maven-scala-plugin compile t

[Lift] Re: scalac java compilation

2009-01-13 Thread Josh Suereth
Use an older version of the maven plugin (like 2.8) *or* wait till I have the free time to make the option. -Josh On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Meredith Gregory wrote: > Scalads and lasses, > > i believe i've hit a bug in the scalac java compilation. i'm not 100% > certain. To verify i need a

[Lift] Re: scalac java compilation

2009-01-13 Thread Meredith Gregory
Scalads and lasses, i forgot to put the error in. Best wishes, --greg [INFO] [compiler:compile] [INFO] Compiling 139 source files to /Users/lgm/work/src/projex/bobj/naturalselection/target/classes [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD FAIL

[Lift] scalac java compilation

2009-01-13 Thread Meredith Gregory
Scalads and lasses, i believe i've hit a bug in the scalac java compilation. i'm not 100% certain. To verify i need a way to tell scalac *not* to compile java files in the mvn build process for a lift app. i will briefly describe a portion of my build process. i'm building several DSLs. i use BNF

[Lift] Re: dynamic page content

2009-01-13 Thread David Pollak
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Charles F. Munat wrote: > > David Pollak wrote: > > You can also write a snippet that may return XML that includes > > references to other snippets, so you can have a snippet that detects > > what kind of page you're on and if you're on a content page, the snippet

[Lift] Re: 2.7.3-RC2 looks good to me

2009-01-13 Thread Tim Perrett
I belive the IDE plugins to be 3rd party... they are not maintained by scala-core, nore should they be. IDE's dont make the language, the features do. Docs... hmm, thats a tricky one - what docs are you referring to? I think you probably mean "how-to" type documentation right (as opposed to this

[Lift] Re: dynamic page content

2009-01-13 Thread Charles F. Munat
David Pollak wrote: > You can also write a snippet that may return XML that includes > references to other snippets, so you can have a snippet that detects > what kind of page you're on and if you're on a content page, the snippet > will return XML that invokes another snippet that pulls the da

[Lift] Re: 2.7.3-RC2 looks good to me

2009-01-13 Thread Warren Henning
Hooray. Bugs that essentially cripple Lift are bad. Um. Slightly OT: when is the Scala release cycle so slow? They need to stop working on the core language and focus on the stuff they've been neglecting: standard library docs and IDE plugins. Scala is lightyears ahead of just about every other p

[Lift] 2.7.3-RC2 looks good to me

2009-01-13 Thread David Pollak
Folks, I did a 20 hour stress test of Lift compiled against 2.7.3-RC2. There are no apparent reference retention (memory leak) issues. I say, "Ship it!" Thanks, David -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Collaborative Task Management http://much4.us Follow me: http:

[Lift] Re: dynamic page content

2009-01-13 Thread David Pollak
Charles, You can put snippets on the requested page or in the template. It matters not. You can also write a snippet that may return XML that includes references to other snippets, so you can have a snippet that detects what kind of page you're on and if you're on a content page, the snippet will

[Lift] Re: Scala 2.7.3 and Lift testing

2009-01-13 Thread Viktor Klang
PRAISE THE LORD! On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:09 AM, TylerWeir wrote: > > That's good news, or at least the precursor to good news. > > > > On Jan 12, 8:21 pm, "David Pollak" > wrote: > > Folks, > > > > I've been running tests all day long creating and destroying Lift > sessions > > (Lift session