[Lift] Re: JQuery corners

Alex, Thanks for taking the time to put together an example of the issue. I think this whole exchange underscores the value of community. Alex raised an issue and spent the time to put together a reproducible example. Marius, Xavi, and I worked together to understand the issue and discuss solut

[Lift] Re: 24 hours say the memory leaks are gone

On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Marius wrote: > > I can make these changes one of these days if it's fine with you. Please make them as soon as is convenient. It's time to let the bits sit prior to 1.0 shipping. > > > On Feb 8, 5:23 pm, David Pollak wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 12:37 A

[Lift] Re: Is it legal to update a SessionVar in LiftRules.rewrite?

Ok, makes sense. I'll use a RequestVar instead. thanks! alex On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:07 PM, David Pollak wrote: > Alex, > The session is not in scope during the rewrite phase, so SessionVars are > not available. This is because the rewrite happens before dispatching > begins and dispatching

[Lift] Re: JQuery corners

Thanks guys! Silly me, I was looking at "Show page source" ... should have used Firebug. (There's a lesson for me here) And thanks for the solution, too. I would not have easily figured out how to work around this situation. alex On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:21 PM, David Pollak wrote: > Alex,

[Lift] Re: 24 hours say the memory leaks are gone

Please ignore this message ... I "removed" it ... I was thinking to something else which of course clarified for me in the mean time :) On Feb 8, 5:24 pm, David Pollak wrote: > On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 5:36 AM, Marius wrote: > > > Related with the above ... would it be ok with you to have a comet

[Lift] Re: 24 hours say the memory leaks are gone

I can make these changes one of these days if it's fine with you. On Feb 8, 5:23 pm, David Pollak wrote: > On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Marius wrote: > > > Dave this is way awesome! > > > I have some questions/suggestions if I may > > > 1. Currently Lift purges the unseen functions that are

[Lift] Re: 24 hours say the memory leaks are gone

On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 5:36 AM, Marius wrote: > > Related with the above ... would it be ok with you to have a comet > long-polling interval configurable from somewhere (i.e LiftRules)? ... > currently it is hardcoded to 10 seconds. The Comet long poll should be restarted 100ms after the last s

[Lift] Re: 24 hours say the memory leaks are gone

On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Marius wrote: > > Dave this is way awesome! > > I have some questions/suggestions if I may > > > 1. Currently Lift purges the unseen functions that are older then 10 > minutes. I think it might help to make this time window configurable > via LiftRules so that peo

[Lift] Re: 24 hours say the memory leaks are gone

Related with the above ... would it be ok with you to have a comet long-polling interval configurable from somewhere (i.e LiftRules)? ... currently it is hardcoded to 10 seconds. On Feb 8, 10:37 am, Marius wrote: > Dave this is way awesome! > > I have some questions/suggestions if I may > > 1. C

[Lift] Re: Serving text/html to IE

Try IE developer toolbar http://www.microsoft.com/downloadS/details.aspx?familyid=E59C3964-672D-4511-BB3E-2D5E1DB91038&displaylang=en But firebug is way more superior ... go figure :) Br's, Marius On Feb 7, 8:54 pm, "Charles F. Munat" wrote: > Thanks for all the replies. I couldn't agree more:

[Lift] Re: 24 hours say the memory leaks are gone

Dave this is way awesome! I have some questions/suggestions if I may 1. Currently Lift purges the unseen functions that are older then 10 minutes. I think it might help to make this time window configurable via LiftRules so that people may adjust it to fit their specific application needs. 2.