On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 6:20 AM, czerwonka wrote:
>
> What are the use cases then? Why Mapper over Record? If the answer
> is "people are using it and we have to support it", then why would I
> go down that path. There must have been a reason to create Record
> over Mapper.
Mapper is tied ve
What are the use cases then? Why Mapper over Record? If the answer
is "people are using it and we have to support it", then why would I
go down that path. There must have been a reason to create Record
over Mapper.
On Jul 11, 11:16 pm, Derek Chen-Becker wrote:
> Mapper will be maintained for
Mapper will be maintained for quite a while after Record comes out, and the
two (at present) have similar architectures. JPA is certainly an option, but
don't toss Mapper out as an option simply because Record will be in place in
the near future.
Derek
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 7:41 AM, czerwonka
1.1 is the target for record.
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/aca84784b81a6a2c/5539edffc1c874d1?lnk=gst&q=1.1#5539edffc1c874d1
On Jul 10, 10:53 am, Naftoli Gugenhem wrote:
> Any estimate/guess when record will be usable/complete?
>
> -
It'd be nice not to have to port. I'd hat to have to port my mapper
code as soon after I write it. Maybe JPA is the answer then.
On Jul 10, 7:24 am, "marius d." wrote:
> Mapper as Record is not yet complete.
>
> Br's,
> Marius
>
> On Jul 10, 4:21 pm, czerwonka wrote:
>
> > If I'm starting tod
Any estimate/guess when record will be usable/complete?
-
marius d. wrote:
Mapper as Record is not yet complete.
Br's,
Marius
On Jul 10, 4:21 pm, czerwonka wrote:
> If I'm starting today, should I use Mapper or Record?
--~--~-~--~~---
Mapper as Record is not yet complete.
Br's,
Marius
On Jul 10, 4:21 pm, czerwonka wrote:
> If I'm starting today, should I use Mapper or Record?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post
On Jun 16, 3:17 pm, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote:
> On 16 Jun 2009, marius d. wrote:
>
> > Lift Record currently is not implemented for DB interaction but it's
> > targeted for 1.1 release.
>
> That probably explains why I couldn't find much when looking through the
> source :-)
>
>
>
> > I'd say
On 16 Jun 2009, marius d. wrote:
> Lift Record currently is not implemented for DB interaction but it's
> targeted for 1.1 release.
That probably explains why I couldn't find much when looking through the
source :-)
>
> I'd say to start development using the Mapper and when Record is ready
> m
Lift Record currently is not implemented for DB interaction but it's
targeted for 1.1 release.
I'd say to start development using the Mapper and when Record is ready
migrate to the Record. I would expect to be a fairly easy transition
from Mapper to Record though.
Br's,
Marius
On Jun 16, 12:16
10 matches
Mail list logo
