Why not use Lift's parser one for the purpose of Record integration?
However the way I see it converting from a Record to JSON the result
should be a JsObj structure so that it can be used in other JS
expressions. Also converting from a Record to JsObj is pretty straight
forward at this Record
As long as we're talking about parsers for JSON, is there some problem or
something missing from the Scala library's JSON parser that keeps us from
using that in Lift?
http://www.scala-lang.org/docu/files/api/scala/util/parsing/json/JSON$object.html
I maintain that one, so if there's some issue
Fair enough :)
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 2:16 PM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.comwrote:
Scala's JSON parser sits on top of some of Scala's parsing problems
including recursive stuff that causes the parser to run out of stack when
there are too many of certain kinds of elements.
Even
POC == Proof of concept
On Mar 5, 11:33 pm, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote:
POC?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To
Hey Folks,
I wrote a Json AST and parser/serializer for unrelated reasons yesterday.
This could be the basis of a Record -- Json tool.
--j
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:11 AM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Although I'm using JPA, I'm very curious as to where you're going with
this. Most of my websites have secure administrative interfaces. Lately,
I've been playing around with Ext Js (extending YUI) for the back end,
and having a single admin page that modifies itself on the basis of
AJAX (or
POC?
marius d. wrote:
:) .. ok ... let me noodle for while on this and I'll get back with
more details ... perhaps a POC
On Mar 4, 7:11 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was thinking that it
:) .. ok ... let me noodle for while on this and I'll get back with
more details ... perhaps a POC
On Mar 4, 7:11 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was thinking that it might be useful to be
Interesting thread. Whats going on with Record at the moment? Now 1.0
is out, will attention shift back to making record the primary
persistence mech in lift?
(sorry for the thread hi-jack)
Cheers, Tim
On Mar 4, 5:20 pm, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
:) .. ok ... let me noodle for
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:
Interesting thread. Whats going on with Record at the moment? Now 1.0
is out, will attention shift back to making record the primary
persistence mech in lift?
(sorry for the thread hi-jack)
We'll chat about that
10 matches
Mail list logo
