[Lift] Re: Schemifier for Record?

2009-07-29 Thread Giuseppe Fogliazza
Thank you for the interest and the kind offering to adapt the framework. I will post my request. At the moment the major extension that I would require to Record is a neat management of MultiField[T]. I need them in my domain model and they will be persisted as multi valued properties (or multiple

[Lift] Re: Schemifier for Record?

2009-07-29 Thread marius d.
On Jul 29, 10:44 am, Giuseppe Fogliazza wrote: > In my comprehension of the overall framework, Mapper provides > persistence together with form management for ui construction and some > serialization method to support the development of  REST services. > In the design of Record, persistency has

[Lift] Re: Schemifier for Record?

2009-07-29 Thread Giuseppe Fogliazza
In my comprehension of the overall framework, Mapper provides persistence together with form management for ui construction and some serialization method to support the development of REST services. In the design of Record, persistency has been stripped away in order to create the condition to pl

[Lift] Re: Schemifier for Record?

2009-07-28 Thread marius d.
Nope. Record currently has nothing to do with RDBMS. It is a higher level of model abstraction that allows various implementations. RDBMS will likely be implemented but likely other models as well such Cassandra and ZooKeeper thru Dave's GoatRodeo. Br's, Marius On Jul 29, 9:16 am, Heiko Seeberge