[Lift] Re: RFC: Restructuring Lift Codebase

2009-09-27 Thread Heiko Seeberger
Indrajit, Impressive work! See my comments below ... Heiko 2009/9/27 Indrajit Raychaudhuri > > [A] lift-* prefix looks superfluous, but it's best to have one for all > artifacts that generate jar (jar). Also Maven > reactor feels happier when artifactId == directory_name (site > generation, scm

[Lift] Re: RFC: Restructuring Lift Codebase

2009-09-27 Thread marius d.
Generally I like this structure.Please see my other comments below: On Sep 27, 3:44 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuri wrote: > Folks, > > As followup to the proposed goal of "Keeping lift-core neat and > small", here is the first iteration of the revised structure of Lift > codebase. > > liftweb > > - l

[Lift] Re: CometActor timeout problem

2009-09-27 Thread jack
I am still having this problem so I will post a simple example. Say I want to display a list of the numbers 1 to 100. And suppose I have an object Foo and a method bar, which takes an integer and returns an integer. And bar takes about 10 seconds to return. So I want to display the numbers, run Fo

[Lift] Re: Using a nosql database instead of Mapper?

2009-09-27 Thread Timothy Perrett
I'm not familiar with berkly, but I've written my own backend for record and it is very, very nice... Highly recomend it. Cheers Tim Sent from my iPhone On 27 Sep 2009, at 20:39, Naftoli Gugenheim wrote: > > If you're not using Mapper then there's nothing to worry about. > Nothing in l

[Lift] RFC: Restructuring Lift Codebase

2009-09-27 Thread Indrajit Raychaudhuri
Folks, As followup to the proposed goal of "Keeping lift-core neat and small", here is the first iteration of the revised structure of Lift codebase. liftweb - lift-core [10] - lift-base [02] - lift-actor - lift-util - lift-json [03] - lift-webkit [04] - lift-testkit [05] - lift-p

[Lift] Re: Using a nosql database instead of Mapper?

2009-09-27 Thread Naftoli Gugenheim
If you're not using Mapper then there's nothing to worry about. Nothing in lift's core (http, util, etc.) depends on Mapper. If you want to use Mapper with a driver not known by Lift you would probably have to supply your own DriverType, if that's possible. But Mapper is based on SQL. On the ot

[Lift] Using a nosql database instead of Mapper?

2009-09-27 Thread Rick Richardson
How would I go about creating an alternative database wrapper for use with Berkely DB JE instead of Mapper+SQL? Is there something that describes the methods that Lift expects a model object to have? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are

[Lift] Who wants to present Scala or Lift for the Paris JUG ?

2009-09-27 Thread Francois Armand
Hello guys, The Paris Java User Group ( http://www.parisjug.org ) is interested in a Scala presentation. It's a rather young JUG (about 18 months old) but is already an unavoidable monthly event. In general, Paris JUG meeting are composed of two 50 minutes presentations in French, separated b

[Lift] Re: Tabbed browsing and "session" state

2009-09-27 Thread Naftoli Gugenheim
Do you mean multiple browser tabs? They won't interfere, because which stateful snippet is used in a given request depends on which is registered in that request which depends on which function is called which depends on which function id is in the request query parameters which depends on the

[Lift] Re: Tabbed browsing and "session" state

2009-09-27 Thread Timothy Perrett
Please bear in mind that this is *first pass* code and nothing production ready. Cheers, Tim On 27 Sep 2009, at 16:10, marius d. wrote: > Please see the lift-wizard project. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go

[Lift] Re: Tabbed browsing and "session" state

2009-09-27 Thread marius d.
Tiro, Please see the lift-wizard project. Br's, Marius On Sep 27, 1:33 am, tiro wrote: > Naftoli, > thanks for providing these insights into the inner workings of > Stateful Snippets. The mapSnippet solution sounds interesting. I knew > that snippets don't live on when not needed, but assumed

[Lift] Re: Tabbed browsing and "session" state

2009-09-27 Thread tiro
Naftoli, thanks for providing these insights into the inner workings of Stateful Snippets. The mapSnippet solution sounds interesting. I knew that snippets don't live on when not needed, but assumed that IF one is alive in the current session, you would always get that one instance. Hence at most