Hi,
For most apps cannonicalization is not really necessary as the
character stream for form-url-encoded is UTF-8 by default as Lift uses
UTF-8 by default. Oh and the conversion from URL encoding to plain
UTF-8 content is really done by container and when we get the params
from the request
Oh and about XSS Lift is safe by default.
Marius
On Jun 10, 9:39 am, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
For most apps cannonicalization is not really necessary as the
character stream for form-url-encoded is UTF-8 by default as Lift uses
UTF-8 by default. Oh and the conversion
There is soldering involved? I used to solder when I was in the Navy...
(Sorry, Tim. Can't resist sometimes.)
Chas.
Derek Chen-Becker wrote:
I'm a bit of a perfectionist when it comes to things like this. It will
never be good enough for me ;)
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Timothy
2nd edition?
Derek Chen-Becker wrote:
No, the book ended up being much larger than they anticipated and if I
understand it correctly, their workflow process could not handle that
many chapters/sections. We had two options: wait for APress to fix the
workflow and miss having the book out
All,
A friend of mine if growing the appetite for Lift (go figure) and he's
starting to build a new app on GAE and he's using JDO. Of course
things didn't go very well as DataNucleus was reporting some strange
errors. Looks like DataNucleus has a bug (see here
Note sure I'd agree make is all that simple... Unless you're doing something
VERY basic then it's loaded with potential for accidental complexity. The
whole philosophy of maven is to do the Right Thing(tm) by default, although
I must admit that boilerplate for configuring plugins is frequently a
We'd love to do a second edition down the road. Lift is still evolving very
quickly, so I have no doubt that there will be lots of new info to cover.
Derek
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote:
2nd edition?
Derek Chen-Becker wrote:
No, the book ended up
I have a feeling that we'll have to do a 2nd edition.
On Jun 10, 9:26 am, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com wrote:
We'd love to do a second edition down the road. Lift is still evolving very
quickly, so I have no doubt that there will be lots of new info to cover.
Derek
On Wed, Jun
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:39 PM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
For most apps cannonicalization is not really necessary as the
character stream for form-url-encoded is UTF-8 by default as Lift uses
UTF-8 by default. Oh and the conversion from URL encoding to plain
UTF-8
Lol! That's funny, I cant spell - its true im afraid!!
On 10/06/2009 09:38, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote:
There is soldering involved? I used to solder when I was in the Navy...
(Sorry, Tim. Can't resist sometimes.)
Chas.
Derek Chen-Becker wrote:
I'm a bit of a
Quick follow-up I've since discovered you can use the 'Webapp-Context:'
manifest entry with PAX Web Extender and Spring dm Server to achieve this.
http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/WAR+Extender
http://jira.springframework.org/browse/OSGI-468
alex
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Alex
Hi there,
It seems that GAE/J has changed its configuration recently,
and you may encounter the crash with
'java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException'.
If so, please try the latest 1.1-SNAPSHOT.
For lift committers, it seems that 'hasContinuations_?'[1] has become 'true',
private val
This morning I created a group on LinkedIn for Lift enthusiasts. I
called it LiftWeb and here's the link to the group -
http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2017908. Hopefully this will build
more interest in Lift and enable Lift people to meet.
Thanks,
Mark
Cool. I just joined.
Thanks for taking the initiative to do this!
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Mark Baker markmbake...@gmail.com wrote:
This morning I created a group on LinkedIn for Lift enthusiasts. I
called it LiftWeb and here's the link to the group -
Lifted,
i gotta say this thread of activity is just so cool. It's what i always
dreamed open source would be like. The community essentially gets to access
and think with each others' best minds and act with each others' best
talents to arrive on a path to a better concrete realization of
2009/6/9 Jonas Bonér jbo...@gmail.com:
2009/6/9 David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com:
Jonas,
We always use Maven to load dependencies. We never use GPL dependencies.
If you have a question about the license of a dependency and its use in
Lift, please ping me privately.
I am using
Sure thing. Glad to help where I can.
Mark
On Jun 10, 11:28 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
Cool. I just joined.
Thanks for taking the initiative to do this!
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Mark Baker markmbake...@gmail.com wrote:
This morning I created a group
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Atsuhiko Yamanaka
atsuhiko.yaman...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
It seems that GAE/J has changed its configuration recently,
and you may encounter the crash with
'java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException'.
If so, please try the latest 1.1-SNAPSHOT.
For
Cool!I just joined.
Thanx
Heiko
2009/6/10 Mark Baker markmbake...@gmail.com
This morning I created a group on LinkedIn for Lift enthusiasts. I
called it LiftWeb and here's the link to the group -
http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2017908. Hopefully this will build
more interest in Lift
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:30 AM, David
Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, no. In order to do this, we'd have to have a hard dependency
on Jetty. It may be possible to do an external continuations module and you
are encouraged to research this.
I agree with you
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Atsuhiko Yamanaka
atsuhiko.yaman...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:30 AM, David
Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, no. In order to do this, we'd have to have a hard
dependency
on Jetty. It may be possible to do
On Jun 10, 7:27 pm, Alex Boisvert boisv...@intalio.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Atsuhiko Yamanaka
atsuhiko.yaman...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:30 AM, David
Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, no. In order to do this, we'd
Thanks James.
But I have already found them in a public repo.
/Jonas
2009/6/10 James Strachan james.strac...@gmail.com:
2009/6/9 Jonas Bonér jbo...@gmail.com:
2009/6/9 David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com:
Jonas,
We always use Maven to load dependencies. We never use GPL
While looking at SHtml.selectObj (correponding to select), I noticed
there is no multiSelectObj -- only multiSelect. Is there any
particular reason for this? Would it make sense to add one?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Jonathan Meeks jonathanme...@gmail.comwrote:
While looking at SHtml.selectObj (correponding to select), I noticed
there is no multiSelectObj -- only multiSelect. Is there any
particular reason for this? Would it make sense to add one?
No good reason... I'll
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:58 PM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:39 PM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
For most apps cannonicalization is not really necessary as the
character stream for form-url-encoded is UTF-8 by default as
I was actually going to volunteer to add one. I'd learn something as
I'm new to Lift and Scala.
You'd probably be able to do it faster, but if you wanted to see what
I came up with and give feedback I'd be most appreciative.
--Jonathan
On Jun 10, 6:05 pm, David Pollak
Nice!
Things are moving now, thanks to your guidance. It's a matter of: 1)
knowing what you want to do, and 2) knowing how to do things with
Scala... duh, yea.
I will post my results in a few days after I get everything working
well, but the RequestVar is doing its job.
On Jun 8, 7:18 am,
Here's what I came up with. It seems to work.
I don't know how well it will appear inlined in a posting. Let if you
want it delivered in another fashion.
diff --git a/lift/src/main/scala/net/liftweb/http/SHtml.scala b/lift/
src/main/scala/net/liftweb/http/SHtml.scala
index 22c4832..58e6069
29 matches
Mail list logo
