[Lift] Lift Record
Debasish just posted this: http://debasishg.blogspot.com/2010/02/why-i-dont-like-activerecord-for-domain.html Interesting feedback especially regarding the current design of Record... Cheers, Tim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
Re: [Lift] Lift Record
Sounds like a good plan Ross - have you any specific suggestions about how best to untangle things? Marius - your thoughts as the own of Record? Cheers, Tim On 15 Feb 2010, at 15:03, Ross Mellgren wrote: FWIW, I agree mostly completely, and when I was writing the integration I didn't like the fact that I couldn't make one model object usable for both Couch and an RDBMS (for example). I guess it could be made to support more than one if the persistence-specific stuff was untangled from MetaRecord/Record subclasses and made into mixable traits? -Ross On Feb 15, 2010, at 4:34 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote: Debasish just posted this: http://debasishg.blogspot.com/2010/02/why-i-dont-like-activerecord-for-domain.html Interesting feedback especially regarding the current design of Record... Cheers, Tim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
Re: [Lift] Lift Record
My original goal with Record was to have something like:
class Person extends Record[Person] {
}
class CouchPerson extends Person with CouchDB[Person]
So the persistence mechanism is mixed into an abstract Record.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:
Debasish just posted this:
http://debasishg.blogspot.com/2010/02/why-i-dont-like-activerecord-for-domain.html
Interesting feedback especially regarding the current design of
Record...
Cheers, Tim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comliftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
--
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Surf the harmonics
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
[Lift] Lift Record Documentation
Is there any documentation available for Lift Record Framework? From liftbook: The Record framework is relatively new to Lift. The plan is to move to Record as the primary ORM framework for Lift sometime after version 1.0. Is it the primary ORM now? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Lift Record and Object Oriented DB
I'm real interested in using Lift with OODBs (currently using DB4O and looking and Berkeley). Is the new Record/Field stuff (I'm ignorant about Rails) concussive for this type of data access or if it more for relational structures? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Lift Record Field
All, I just committed in master the code for generic support for Record/ Field. David will start adding JDBC spices soon. Perhaps there a a couple of more field types to add so please take a look and let us know your thoughts. Br's, Marius --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
