Re: [Lift] New ticketing system
On 28 January 2010 15:06, David Pollak wrote: I can host an instance. The big issue as I see it is have a reliable > maintainer. In order to use LiftTicket, we need someone who is around most > of the time (46+ weeks a year), can fix bugs in a few days, has a solid > Internet connection, etc. If we can find a reliable maintainer, I'm all for > moving forward with LiftTicket. > I think this is (too) risky ... Heiko Work: weiglewilczek.com Blog: heikoseeberger.name Follow me: twitter.com/hseeberger OSGi on Scala: scalamodules.org Lift, the simply functional web framework: liftweb.net -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
Re: [Lift] New ticketing system
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim wrote: > Could some people take LiftTicket for a spin and comment? To clarify, it's > already pretty functional. > Here are some things not yet working or partially working, according to > Derek: > >- File attachments >- Possibly user comments (changes are logged), may be just lack of UI > > This would have to work before we started using it. > >- Ticket changes are not yet emailed >- Milestone support may need redesign? Currently has Module and >ModuleRelease; Module allows multiple projects in same LiftTicket instance. >Is that desirable? > > However as a basic tool I think it's decent. I would love to hear comments. > Maybe someone could host an instance of LiftTicket to track its progress? :) > I can host an instance. The big issue as I see it is have a reliable maintainer. In order to use LiftTicket, we need someone who is around most of the time (46+ weeks a year), can fix bugs in a few days, has a solid Internet connection, etc. If we can find a reliable maintainer, I'm all for moving forward with LiftTicket. > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim > wrote: > >> For anyone who wants to give LiftTicket a spin: >> Download it from www.github.com/dchenbecker/LiftTicket >> Extract it into a directory and open a command prompt or shell there >> mvn -Dorg.liftticket.config.masterpass=xxx jetty:run >> Open a browser to http://localhost:8080/config/initial and enter your >> password (what you wrote for xxx above). >> Navigate to User Administration and create a user with full permisions. >> Terminate jetty >> mvn jetty:run >> Login as that user and set up all your settings >> >> There doesn't seem to be a way to configure default permissions. >> >> >> - >> David Pollak wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Naftoli Gugenheim > >wrote: >> >> > I think it would be a *major* wasted opportunity not to invest in >> > LiftTicket. >> >> >> I agree. >> >> >> > It would be an excellent real life showcase of Lift. And of course it >> > wouldn't make sense to switch to Assembla only temporarily. >> > In addition, after all the work Derek put into it, it would be sad not >> to >> > use it. >> > >> >> I agree. >> >> >> > Derek said that it's pretty near functional. G-d willing I will try to >> > download it today and see where it's holding, and see if I can move it >> > forward. David, what features does Assembla have that you would like to >> see >> > in LiftTicket (or even if Assembla doesn't)? >> > >> >> This is pretty compelling: >> >> >> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/clojure/tickets?batch=false&tickets_report_id=1&ticket_id= >> >> As is: >> >> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/tickets/metrics/b4-TTcvBSr3RAZeJe5aVNr >> >> Being able to plan and in other ways communicate among the committers as >> well as with the community is very powerful. >> >> >> > In any case once it's basically usable we can start using it, and add >> > features along the way. >> >> >> I'm all for that! >> >> >> > Also, importing tickets from GitHub should be a matter of a trivial >> scala >> > script. >> > >> > >> > - >> > Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote: >> > >> > David Pollak writes: >> > >> > > Folks, >> > > >> > > We switched to GitHub's ticketing system a bunch of months ago and, >> well, >> > > it's not making the grade. It's slow. It's limited (no unclosing >> > tickets, >> > > no attachments, weak discussion capaibilities). It doesn't allow easy >> > > planning/prioritization. >> > > >> > > I'd like to switch to something more powerful. Derek was working on >> > > LiftTicket. I'd like to use that, but don't know the state of the >> > project. >> > > Alternatively, we could use Assembla's ticketing system. >> > > >> > > Does anyone have thoughts/input on the issue? >> > >> > We're using Assembla. Seems to work fine for our small shop. It has a >> > lot of features that we don't use but which I think could be handy for >> > Lift. >> > >> > Have a look at the clojure space to see how it may look for an OSS >> > project. >> > >> > Also, it seems (haven't tried) that it's possible to import tickets: >> > >> > http://i1t2b3.com/2009/08/26/how-to-import-tickets-assembla/ >> > >> > /Jeppe >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> > "Lift" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> >> > >> > . >> > For more options, visit this group at >> > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> > "Lift" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> >> > >> > . >> > For more
Re: [Lift] New ticketing system
Could some people take LiftTicket for a spin and comment? To clarify, it's already pretty functional. Here are some things not yet working or partially working, according to Derek: - File attachments - Possibly user comments (changes are logged), may be just lack of UI - Ticket changes are not yet emailed - Milestone support may need redesign? Currently has Module and ModuleRelease; Module allows multiple projects in same LiftTicket instance. Is that desirable? However as a basic tool I think it's decent. I would love to hear comments. Maybe someone could host an instance of LiftTicket to track its progress? :) On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim wrote: > For anyone who wants to give LiftTicket a spin: > Download it from www.github.com/dchenbecker/LiftTicket > Extract it into a directory and open a command prompt or shell there > mvn -Dorg.liftticket.config.masterpass=xxx jetty:run > Open a browser to http://localhost:8080/config/initial and enter your > password (what you wrote for xxx above). > Navigate to User Administration and create a user with full permisions. > Terminate jetty > mvn jetty:run > Login as that user and set up all your settings > > There doesn't seem to be a way to configure default permissions. > > > - > David Pollak wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Naftoli Gugenheim >wrote: > > > I think it would be a *major* wasted opportunity not to invest in > > LiftTicket. > > > I agree. > > > > It would be an excellent real life showcase of Lift. And of course it > > wouldn't make sense to switch to Assembla only temporarily. > > In addition, after all the work Derek put into it, it would be sad not to > > use it. > > > > I agree. > > > > Derek said that it's pretty near functional. G-d willing I will try to > > download it today and see where it's holding, and see if I can move it > > forward. David, what features does Assembla have that you would like to > see > > in LiftTicket (or even if Assembla doesn't)? > > > > This is pretty compelling: > > > http://www.assembla.com/spaces/clojure/tickets?batch=false&tickets_report_id=1&ticket_id= > > As is: > > http://www.assembla.com/spaces/tickets/metrics/b4-TTcvBSr3RAZeJe5aVNr > > Being able to plan and in other ways communicate among the committers as > well as with the community is very powerful. > > > > In any case once it's basically usable we can start using it, and add > > features along the way. > > > I'm all for that! > > > > Also, importing tickets from GitHub should be a matter of a trivial scala > > script. > > > > > > - > > Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote: > > > > David Pollak writes: > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > We switched to GitHub's ticketing system a bunch of months ago and, > well, > > > it's not making the grade. It's slow. It's limited (no unclosing > > tickets, > > > no attachments, weak discussion capaibilities). It doesn't allow easy > > > planning/prioritization. > > > > > > I'd like to switch to something more powerful. Derek was working on > > > LiftTicket. I'd like to use that, but don't know the state of the > > project. > > > Alternatively, we could use Assembla's ticketing system. > > > > > > Does anyone have thoughts/input on the issue? > > > > We're using Assembla. Seems to work fine for our small shop. It has a > > lot of features that we don't use but which I think could be handy for > > Lift. > > > > Have a look at the clojure space to see how it may look for an OSS > > project. > > > > Also, it seems (haven't tried) that it's possible to import tickets: > > > > http://i1t2b3.com/2009/08/26/how-to-import-tickets-assembla/ > > > > /Jeppe > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Lift" group. > > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > > > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Lift" group. > > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > > > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > > > > > > -- > Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net > Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp > Surf the harmonics > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
Re: [Lift] New ticketing system
What "worst case scenario" are you afraid of happening using LiftTicket? - Heiko Seeberger wrote: 2010/1/26 David Pollak > Folks, > > We switched to GitHub's ticketing system a bunch of months ago and, well, > it's not making the grade. It's slow. It's limited (no unclosing tickets, > no attachments, weak discussion capaibilities). It doesn't allow easy > planning/prioritization. > > I'd like to switch to something more powerful. Derek was working on > LiftTicket. I'd like to use that, but don't know the state of the project. > Alternatively, we could use Assembla's ticketing system. > > Does anyone have thoughts/input on the issue? > Let's go for Assembla. A ticketing system is ways too important (it just has to work) than we could rely on something under development like LiftTicket. Sorry! Heiko Work: weiglewilczek.com Blog: heikoseeberger.name Follow me: twitter.com/hseeberger OSGi on Scala: scalamodules.org Lift, the simply functional web framework: liftweb.net -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
Re: [Lift] New ticketing system
2010/1/26 David Pollak > Folks, > > We switched to GitHub's ticketing system a bunch of months ago and, well, > it's not making the grade. It's slow. It's limited (no unclosing tickets, > no attachments, weak discussion capaibilities). It doesn't allow easy > planning/prioritization. > > I'd like to switch to something more powerful. Derek was working on > LiftTicket. I'd like to use that, but don't know the state of the project. > Alternatively, we could use Assembla's ticketing system. > > Does anyone have thoughts/input on the issue? > Let's go for Assembla. A ticketing system is ways too important (it just has to work) than we could rely on something under development like LiftTicket. Sorry! Heiko Work: weiglewilczek.com Blog: heikoseeberger.name Follow me: twitter.com/hseeberger OSGi on Scala: scalamodules.org Lift, the simply functional web framework: liftweb.net -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
Re: [Lift] New ticketing system
For anyone who wants to give LiftTicket a spin: Download it from www.github.com/dchenbecker/LiftTicket Extract it into a directory and open a command prompt or shell there mvn -Dorg.liftticket.config.masterpass=xxx jetty:run Open a browser to http://localhost:8080/config/initial and enter your password (what you wrote for xxx above). Navigate to User Administration and create a user with full permisions. Terminate jetty mvn jetty:run Login as that user and set up all your settings There doesn't seem to be a way to configure default permissions. - David Pollak wrote: On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Naftoli Gugenheim wrote: > I think it would be a *major* wasted opportunity not to invest in > LiftTicket. I agree. > It would be an excellent real life showcase of Lift. And of course it > wouldn't make sense to switch to Assembla only temporarily. > In addition, after all the work Derek put into it, it would be sad not to > use it. > I agree. > Derek said that it's pretty near functional. G-d willing I will try to > download it today and see where it's holding, and see if I can move it > forward. David, what features does Assembla have that you would like to see > in LiftTicket (or even if Assembla doesn't)? > This is pretty compelling: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/clojure/tickets?batch=false&tickets_report_id=1&ticket_id= As is: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/tickets/metrics/b4-TTcvBSr3RAZeJe5aVNr Being able to plan and in other ways communicate among the committers as well as with the community is very powerful. > In any case once it's basically usable we can start using it, and add > features along the way. I'm all for that! > Also, importing tickets from GitHub should be a matter of a trivial scala > script. > > > - > Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote: > > David Pollak writes: > > > Folks, > > > > We switched to GitHub's ticketing system a bunch of months ago and, well, > > it's not making the grade. It's slow. It's limited (no unclosing > tickets, > > no attachments, weak discussion capaibilities). It doesn't allow easy > > planning/prioritization. > > > > I'd like to switch to something more powerful. Derek was working on > > LiftTicket. I'd like to use that, but don't know the state of the > project. > > Alternatively, we could use Assembla's ticketing system. > > > > Does anyone have thoughts/input on the issue? > > We're using Assembla. Seems to work fine for our small shop. It has a > lot of features that we don't use but which I think could be handy for > Lift. > > Have a look at the clojure space to see how it may look for an OSS > project. > > Also, it seems (haven't tried) that it's possible to import tickets: > > http://i1t2b3.com/2009/08/26/how-to-import-tickets-assembla/ > > /Jeppe > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
Re: [Lift] New ticketing system
> We used Lighthouse briefly and it was a seriously suboptimal user experience > for me and others... thus the switch to GitHub. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
Re: [Lift] New ticketing system
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Naftoli Gugenheim wrote: > I think it would be a *major* wasted opportunity not to invest in > LiftTicket. I agree. > It would be an excellent real life showcase of Lift. And of course it > wouldn't make sense to switch to Assembla only temporarily. > In addition, after all the work Derek put into it, it would be sad not to > use it. > I agree. > Derek said that it's pretty near functional. G-d willing I will try to > download it today and see where it's holding, and see if I can move it > forward. David, what features does Assembla have that you would like to see > in LiftTicket (or even if Assembla doesn't)? > This is pretty compelling: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/clojure/tickets?batch=false&tickets_report_id=1&ticket_id= As is: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/tickets/metrics/b4-TTcvBSr3RAZeJe5aVNr Being able to plan and in other ways communicate among the committers as well as with the community is very powerful. > In any case once it's basically usable we can start using it, and add > features along the way. I'm all for that! > Also, importing tickets from GitHub should be a matter of a trivial scala > script. > > > - > Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote: > > David Pollak writes: > > > Folks, > > > > We switched to GitHub's ticketing system a bunch of months ago and, well, > > it's not making the grade. It's slow. It's limited (no unclosing > tickets, > > no attachments, weak discussion capaibilities). It doesn't allow easy > > planning/prioritization. > > > > I'd like to switch to something more powerful. Derek was working on > > LiftTicket. I'd like to use that, but don't know the state of the > project. > > Alternatively, we could use Assembla's ticketing system. > > > > Does anyone have thoughts/input on the issue? > > We're using Assembla. Seems to work fine for our small shop. It has a > lot of features that we don't use but which I think could be handy for > Lift. > > Have a look at the clojure space to see how it may look for an OSS > project. > > Also, it seems (haven't tried) that it's possible to import tickets: > > http://i1t2b3.com/2009/08/26/how-to-import-tickets-assembla/ > > /Jeppe > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
Re: [Lift] New ticketing system
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Daniel Truemper wrote: > Hi, > > so far I have been a passive reader of this group. Lift is just a (very) > smal time project, but I like it a lot! Anyways: > > >> We switched to GitHub's ticketing system a bunch of months ago and, > well, > >> it's not making the grade. It's slow. It's limited (no unclosing > tickets, > >> no attachments, weak discussion capaibilities). It doesn't allow easy > >> planning/prioritization. > >> > >> I'd like to switch to something more powerful. Derek was working on > >> LiftTicket. I'd like to use that, but don't know the state of the > project. > >> Alternatively, we could use Assembla's ticketing system. > >> > >> Does anyone have thoughts/input on the issue? > I see many projects on GitHub using Lighthouse: > We used Lighthouse briefly and it was a seriously suboptimal user experience for me and others... thus the switch to GitHub. > > http://lighthouseapp.com/ > > And if I remember correctly, the github's service hook for lighthouse > will enable the 'closes #123' type of commit messages... > > Best > Daniel > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
Re: [Lift] New ticketing system
Hi, so far I have been a passive reader of this group. Lift is just a (very) smal time project, but I like it a lot! Anyways: >> We switched to GitHub's ticketing system a bunch of months ago and, well, >> it's not making the grade. It's slow. It's limited (no unclosing tickets, >> no attachments, weak discussion capaibilities). It doesn't allow easy >> planning/prioritization. >> >> I'd like to switch to something more powerful. Derek was working on >> LiftTicket. I'd like to use that, but don't know the state of the project. >> Alternatively, we could use Assembla's ticketing system. >> >> Does anyone have thoughts/input on the issue? I see many projects on GitHub using Lighthouse: http://lighthouseapp.com/ And if I remember correctly, the github's service hook for lighthouse will enable the 'closes #123' type of commit messages... Best Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
Re: [Lift] New ticketing system
I think it would be a *major* wasted opportunity not to invest in LiftTicket. It would be an excellent real life showcase of Lift. And of course it wouldn't make sense to switch to Assembla only temporarily. In addition, after all the work Derek put into it, it would be sad not to use it. Derek said that it's pretty near functional. G-d willing I will try to download it today and see where it's holding, and see if I can move it forward. David, what features does Assembla have that you would like to see in LiftTicket (or even if Assembla doesn't)? In any case once it's basically usable we can start using it, and add features along the way. Also, importing tickets from GitHub should be a matter of a trivial scala script. - Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote: David Pollak writes: > Folks, > > We switched to GitHub's ticketing system a bunch of months ago and, well, > it's not making the grade. It's slow. It's limited (no unclosing tickets, > no attachments, weak discussion capaibilities). It doesn't allow easy > planning/prioritization. > > I'd like to switch to something more powerful. Derek was working on > LiftTicket. I'd like to use that, but don't know the state of the project. > Alternatively, we could use Assembla's ticketing system. > > Does anyone have thoughts/input on the issue? We're using Assembla. Seems to work fine for our small shop. It has a lot of features that we don't use but which I think could be handy for Lift. Have a look at the clojure space to see how it may look for an OSS project. Also, it seems (haven't tried) that it's possible to import tickets: http://i1t2b3.com/2009/08/26/how-to-import-tickets-assembla/ /Jeppe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
Re: [Lift] New ticketing system
David Pollak writes: > Folks, > > We switched to GitHub's ticketing system a bunch of months ago and, well, > it's not making the grade. It's slow. It's limited (no unclosing tickets, > no attachments, weak discussion capaibilities). It doesn't allow easy > planning/prioritization. > > I'd like to switch to something more powerful. Derek was working on > LiftTicket. I'd like to use that, but don't know the state of the project. > Alternatively, we could use Assembla's ticketing system. > > Does anyone have thoughts/input on the issue? We're using Assembla. Seems to work fine for our small shop. It has a lot of features that we don't use but which I think could be handy for Lift. Have a look at the clojure space to see how it may look for an OSS project. Also, it seems (haven't tried) that it's possible to import tickets: http://i1t2b3.com/2009/08/26/how-to-import-tickets-assembla/ /Jeppe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
[Lift] New ticketing system
Folks, We switched to GitHub's ticketing system a bunch of months ago and, well, it's not making the grade. It's slow. It's limited (no unclosing tickets, no attachments, weak discussion capaibilities). It doesn't allow easy planning/prioritization. I'd like to switch to something more powerful. Derek was working on LiftTicket. I'd like to use that, but don't know the state of the project. Alternatively, we could use Assembla's ticketing system. Does anyone have thoughts/input on the issue? Thanks, David -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
