[Lift] Re: Flot 0.6 Upgrade Breaking Change Question

2010-02-05 Thread Peter Robinett
True. Good solution. On Feb 5, 11:29 am, Aaron Valade wrote: > Would we even need to prioritize it?  If Flot supports both, we should > let it do the hard work of deciding which one to use if they are both > present, which I would imagine would be a very rare case. We can just > mark the old meth

Re: [Lift] Re: Flot 0.6 Upgrade Breaking Change Question

2010-02-05 Thread Aaron Valade
Would we even need to prioritize it? If Flot supports both, we should let it do the hard work of deciding which one to use if they are both present, which I would imagine would be a very rare case. We can just mark the old methods as deprecated and then remove them in the future when Flot doesn't

[Lift] Re: Flot 0.6 Upgrade Breaking Change Question

2010-02-05 Thread Peter Robinett
It requires changing the FlotOptions trait. Actually, we could do exactly what Flot 0.6 does and support both (just add the series option without removing the lines, points and shadowSize options), though then we'd need some way to prioritize one way over the other. Peter On Feb 5, 10:43 am, Davi