I renamed it that because this is about making it easier for newbies
to get up and running with eclipse - its not a problem per-say, as
everything compiles just fine without it, but this will no doubt save
a lot of head scratching which can only be a good thing :-)
On Apr 20, 1:07 am, Miles
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Miles Sabin mi...@milessabin.com wrote:
I think that all of this sounds generally positive, but I have to ask ...
Why is this thread (now) titled Improving out Eclipse experience?
What is Eclipse doing wrong here?
Cheers,
Miles
TBH my biggest
Thats odd - I added:
dependency
groupIdorg.mortbay.jetty/groupId
artifactIdjetty/artifactId
version6.1.16/version
scopeprovided/scope
/dependency
to my pom.xml, but still eclipse cannot find the appropriate class?
Cheers, Tim
Hmm im inclined to agree - lets wait and see what the general consensus is.
If its positive, then I'll update the archetypes tomorrow.
Cheers, Tim
On 19/04/2009 22:12, Heiko Seeberger heiko.seeber...@googlemail.com
wrote:
+1 for changing.
Am 19.04.2009 um 22:59 schrieb Timothy Perrett
I think that all of this sounds generally positive, but I have to ask ...
Why is this thread (now) titled Improving out Eclipse experience?
What is Eclipse doing wrong here?
Cheers,
Miles
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Timothy Perrett
timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote:
Hmm im inclined to
