To: liftweb@googlegroups.com
Subject: [Lift] Re: Lift documentation -- Attention newcomers (and
everyone else)!
Formalities or content?
http://wiki.liftweb.net/index.php/Maven_Mini_Guide
must be improved. For people not accustomed to maven it is very hard to
grasp the versions/release/snapshot/pom
Examples, examples, examples, including scala.
The scala-lang site is a bit daunting. I think you'll get more
traction on Lift if you help people to get to grips with scala as well
as lift. I have no idea whether I'm a typical newcomer, but I have
come from Java (previously other things going
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 7:58 AM, richard.car...@me.com richard.car...@me.com
wrote:
My personal view is that a worked example of a fully featured
eCommerce type site would be most useful. Even something as simple as
a cut down Amazon style store with inventory management would be a
great
Hi Chas,
Glad to see that there will be some time spent expanding and refining
the Lift documentation, good docs are definitely the sign of a well
run project. I am one of those lurkers you speak about, so I thought
I'd speak up and give my input.
I would like to see explanations on creating
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Axel Rose axel.roesl...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hello Charles,
I know I'm a bit late for your request to consolidate the lift wiki.
Anyway:
It's really puzzling to me to get the version numbers right, when creating
a new
archetype with maven.
The Maven mini
My personal view is that a worked example of a fully featured
eCommerce type site would be most useful. Even something as simple as
a cut down Amazon style store with inventory management would be a
great start. That would be a useful foundation for the rest of Lift's
features (add-ons such as
I'd like to help with the wiki as well. Let me know if there is
anything in particular that you would like me to do.
--Bryan
On May 3, 9:46 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Axel Rose axel.roesl...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hello Charles,
Wow! Too lazy to register?! IMO, registration is a one-time event and is
needed to combat spam / bot activity. Rather than having a system where
people complain / suggest alterations, we prefer people to just get on and
change them... Power to the people!
On 03/05/2009 14:33, Axel Rose
Richard, its a shame you feel like that. Your comments about examples are
noted, however you must bear in mind that both scala and lift are young
(relatively speaking) and a lot of the applications that are out there, are
behind corporate firewalls (including mine) - so don't be fooled into
Thanks, Axel. Will take this under consideration.
Chas.
Axel Rose wrote:
Hello Charles,
I know I'm a bit late for your request to consolidate the lift wiki.
Anyway:
It's really puzzling to me to get the version numbers right, when creating a
new
archetype with maven.
The Maven
Thanks, Richard. Very helpful.
Chas.
richard.car...@me.com wrote:
My personal view is that a worked example of a fully featured
eCommerce type site would be most useful. Even something as simple as
a cut down Amazon style store with inventory management would be a
great start. That would be
Thanks! Will do!
Chas.
Bryan. wrote:
I'd like to help with the wiki as well. Let me know if there is
anything in particular that you would like me to do.
--Bryan
On May 3, 9:46 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Axel Rose
Formalities or content?
http://wiki.liftweb.net/index.php/Maven_Mini_Guide
must be improved. For people not accustomed to maven it is very hard
to grasp the versions/release/snapshot/pom dependencies.
Various articles use various version numbers when building examples.
I, personally, got lost.
Hello List!
I might as well share my thoughts about docs.
I think as with Scala and Lift you should try to beat the best that is out
there. And from all the user made language/API/framework wikis I have seen
the one from a now pretty unpopular game is by far the best:
Tom,
Thanks for this link! The Second Life wiki is very interesting, and
makes it obvious that one can do a lot with MediaWiki. I'll definitely
spend some time exploring it.
Chas.
Tom Arnold wrote:
Hello List!
I might as well share my thoughts about docs.
I think as with Scala and
James,
This looks more like about $20, but I'm not complaining. Your thoughts
mirror mine in many ways. #4 is a very good idea. Even just a list of
what is needed. Folks could add to a documentation wishlist, and then
anyone who thought he or she could tackle an item could just do it.
I'm
16 matches
Mail list logo
