On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Derek Chen-Becker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Awesome. Am I reading that right that you could essentially embed scala code
> right in the POM?
I didn't test it, but you should be able to do it.
/davidB
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You r
Awesome. Am I reading that right that you could essentially embed scala code
right in the POM?
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:50 PM, David Bernard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> @Tim
> I don't have more info than the announce of 2.1.0-m1 or the following
> article :
> * http://www.mail-archive.c
Hi,
@Tim
I don't have more info than the announce of 2.1.0-m1 or the following article :
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg89838.html
* http://blogs.sonatype.com/john/2008/09/19/1221844609400.html
(and I didn't find time to test the new version of maven)
@Derek
Jesse Eichar cont
I agree on the Maven mojo programming. Anything to simplify custom build
"scripts" would be great, so SBT sounds like an interesting idea. I didn't
mean to imply that it was a bad idea, just that you don't need all of the
"-Ds" :)
Derek
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Tim Perrett <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hey Derek,
I know about this command :-)
My observation (of my friend at least) is that his reaction was "holy-
cow, i need to learn this build tool, a new language and a new
framework". The language and framework part you cant get away from
invariably but perhaps we can do something on the buil
There's no *requirement* to use all of the "-D" stuff. If you just do
mvn -U archetype:generate
you actually get a nice list of archetypes, two of which are:
31: internal -> lift-archetype-blank (A blank/empty liftweb project)
32: internal -> lift-archetype-basic (The basic (liftweb) project)
I
I took a quick look at it. like make, ant, builr the main issue I've
got with it's it require scala to be installed and to don't manage the
version of scala use to build you're project. And I suspect it could
only build scala-project that used the same version as the tools
itself.
But I pro a new
god no, I dont want to replace maven :-)
There is talk of SBT having rake type functionality in the not too
distant future, so that was more what I was thinking. I appreciate
that maven can do all that stuff but from a beginer perspective its
pretty difficult for them to learn.
I recently persua
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Tim Perrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
> Check this out:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/simple-build-tool/
>
> It appeared a couple of days ago - im wondering if its something we
> could customize to make starting lift projects easier? Its all written
> i
I don't see a downside to providing an alternative build system to people
who are very Maven-averse (as long as I don't have to maintain it!, heh)
But yeah, replacing Maven at this point seems unwise, unless there are very
compelling reasons.
--j
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 12:15 PM, David Pollak
Looks interesting. I subscribed to the list to keep an eye on it.
Ty
On Oct 5, 1:59 pm, Tim Perrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Check this out:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/simple-build-tool/
>
> It appeared a couple of days ago - im wondering if its something we
> could customize to
11 matches
Mail list logo
