ah, I was always curious what S stood for.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:33 PM, David Pollak
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Vesa wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I feel that having classes with names like S wastes my very limited
>> brain ram while reading or writing lift applications. Why not to use
>> more describing but longer names? Not wasting bytes on these difficult
>> economic times? This might be unfair rant as I didn't find any others,
>> but this damn S keeps popping up a lot :D
>
> S == Stateful
>
> Back when I started doing Lift, there were no IDEs, no code completion, and
> access to the stateful parts of Lift was common, so I called this S.
>
> If you don't like it:
>
> import net.liftweb.http.{S => SomethingLongerThanS}
>
>>
>> ps. Great framework!
>>
>> - Vesa
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
> Surf the harmonics
>
> >
>
--
Omnem crede diem tibi diluxisse supremum.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
