I need to create a snippet sequence that looks something like this:
name
description
The anchor needs to be generated using SHtml.link, and name &
description need to be bound. As a result, I end up with a template
sequence like this:
Then, I need snippet code
Hi,
I need XmlResponse with cookies, but have gotten following error.
$ mvn scala:console
scala> import _root_.net.liftweb.http._
import _root_.net.liftweb.http._
scala> new XmlResponse(){
| override def cookies = S.responseCookies
| }
:8: error: type mismatch;
fou
Wouldn't a more appropriate idiom be to use overloaded apply methods in a
companion object?
That is:
def apply(node: NodeSeq): XmlResponse
def apply(node: NodeSeq, cookies: List[HTTPCookie]): XmlResponse
Thoughts?
Cheers, Tim
On 11 Nov 2009, at 10:21, Atsuhiko Yamanaka wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
Fixed, and in master.
http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/commit/0cac04cb0d05c07a222d07f980ecf9946ec49588
Cheers, Indrajit
On Nov 7, 9:41 am, aw wrote:
> Looking at this: http://download.java.net/maven/2/javax/mail/mail/
> it would seem that Sun is close to releasing JavaMail 1.4.3.
>
> Technically
Hi,
does AutoComplete work ?
I tried running the lift-example from snapshot on a local server,
autocompletion isn't happening on the AJAX Samples page. The rest of the
Ajax stuff works fine.
AC does work on http://demo.liftweb.net/ajax though, so the problem doesn't
seem to be browser-related.
I
I'm glad to hear you like what you've seen so far with Pulse! I don't
think we could do half the stuff we're doing without Lift backing us
up. Stay tuned, we'll have more than a video to share with the group
soon :)
David
On Nov 8, 3:54 pm, Timothy Perrett wrote:
> Kudos everyone - the fact t
I'm a little late to the party, but Pulse is really quite amazing.
Well done all.
David LaP, I eagerly await anything you have to share.
Tyler
On Nov 11, 1:14 am, David LaPalomento wrote:
> I'm glad to hear you like what you've seen so far with Pulse! I don't
> think we could do half the stuf
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim wrote:
> Hello.
> When I wrote ManyToMany a couple of months ago, I designed it to internally
> hold a collection of join table records, and to act as a collection of
> elements of the child table.
> For example, given Volunteer and VolunteerGroup
What are you unhappy about? Those tests look pretty simple and slick
to me!
It looks like the JettyTestServer is a singleton inside the test suite
- what happens if you have another test suite? I think you'd then hit
the same problem that I did, when the second test suite tries to fire
up Jetty i
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Atsuhiko Yamanaka <
atsuhiko.yaman...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I need XmlResponse with cookies, but have gotten following error.
>
> $ mvn scala:console
>
> scala> import _root_.net.liftweb.http._
> import _root_.net.liftweb.http._
>
> scala> new XmlRespon
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Alex Black wrote:
>
> What are you unhappy about? Those tests look pretty simple and slick
> to me!
>
>
Yeah, but with this change: http://reviewboard.liftweb.net/r/95/
You'll get:
"Login" in {
for{
login <- post("/api/login", "token" -> token) !@
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:55 AM, TylerWeir wrote:
>
> I'm a little late to the party, but Pulse is really quite amazing.
> Well done all.
>
> David LaP, I eagerly await anything you have to share.
>
Me2
>
> Tyler
>
> On Nov 11, 1:14 am, David LaPalomento wrote:
> > I'm glad to hear you like w
I think a fix to this was pushed this morning. Once this job is finished:
http://hudson.scala-tools.org/job/Lift/1367/ It should be available on
SNAPSHOT.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:49 PM, harryh wrote:
>
> This is on M7:
>
> scala> import
> scala.xml.Elem
> import scala.xml.Elem
>
> scala> imp
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:36 PM, ben wrote:
>
> Which brings us back to my original point ... how can we preserve
> acceptance tests ?
> Do we need to have a stack-trace hash on the form ids or can we have a
> non-unique-id-through-the-webapp but unique to the form in order to
> achieve this.
>
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:35 AM, aw wrote:
>
> I need to create a snippet sequence that looks something like this:
>
>
>name
>description
>
>
>
> The anchor needs to be generated using SHtml.link, and name &
> description need to be bound. As a result, I end up with a template
> s
It's stuck on review board.
We're thinking of a M7.1 release because M7 is pretty broken with this issue
and the Session-related issue that Harry reported.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Ross Mellgren wrote:
> Hey, any news on when this change will be pushed? I compiled a local copy
> and ver
Looks nice.
Singleton - ah, yes, that sounds like it will work well, good call.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:05 PM, David Pollak <
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Alex Black wrote:
>
>>
>> What are you unhappy about? Those tests look pretty simple and
To clarify: The fundamental purpose of ManyToMany, like OneToMany, is that
rather than dealing with "children" of an entity as they are in the database at
a given moment, instead, they should have similar semantics to a MappedField:
You load it from the database, modify it to your hearts conten
M7.1 would be extremely helpful to me as I'm trying to move a project
into QA and I'm loathe to use a moving target for QA. However, if need
be I can stick with a working SNAPSHOT up until M8, if M8 is really
coming around first week Dec.
-Ross
On Nov 11, 2009, at 12:21 PM, David Pollak wro
You might need to surround the kids => ... function with parenthesis.
-
David Pollak wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:35 AM, aw wrote:
>
> I need to create a snippet sequence that looks something like this:
>
>
>name
>description
>
>
>
> The a
OK, your suggestion definitely makes the snippet code more readable,
but I fear I didn't make my point clear because the snippet code still
is highly coupled with the view layout.
Imagine that I want to change my view from this:
name
description
to this:
name
description
You can do a recursive bind, but you must make it explicit:
def mySnippet(xhtml: NodeSeq): NodeSeq = {
def doBind(xhtml: NodeSeq): NodeSeq =
bind("b", xhtml,
"link" -> { (kids: NodeSeq) => SHtml.link("next", () =>
clicked(b), doBind(kids)) },
"name" ->
Take a look at:
http://logji.blogspot.com/2009/09/composable-bindings-in-lift.html
and then:
http://logji.blogspot.com/2009/10/composable-bindings-in-lift-part-ii.html
Sounds like this could provide a more flexible implementation pattern for your
use case.
Cheers, Tim
On 11 Nov 2009, at 18
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:21 AM, aw wrote:
>
> OK, your suggestion definitely makes the snippet code more readable,
> but I fear I didn't make my point clear because the snippet code still
> is highly coupled with the view layout.
>
If this was a MVC type framework, I think you're point would b
I didn't see Tim's blog post, but another option is to bind in two passes.
First bind the outer level: b1:link should become an SHtml.link, preserving the
same set of child elements. So here use a NodeSeq function: kids =>
SHtml.link(..., kids). Then pass the resulting NodeSeq to a bind invocat
Hi,
I'm currently adding a uniqueness requirement to a field, but there
are duplicate entries (for empty string) in my database already.
Currently valUnique maps each match it found to a FieldError, but
should probably return one FieldError regardless of how many matches
it finds.
- Jon
--~--~--
Folks,
There are two critical issues with M7:
- Issue 164 http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues#issue/164 JSON/Ajax
messages do not carry Notices back to the client.
- The Session manager is not initialized properly. Basically, this means
that sessions will be expired by the web cont
Thanks for the reply David. Below is some code which might suit both
our requirements ...
def locateFirstUserStackElement(stack: Array[StackTraceElement]) :
StackTraceElement = {
stack.foreach(element => {
if (!element.toString.startsWith("net.liftweb")) return
eleme
Hi,
I was talking with David Pollak the other night about putting some
ScalaTest examples into the Lift archetypes. He said I should post to
the list. Can anyone out there let me know how we might go about that?
Thanks.
Bill
Bill Venners
Artima, Inc.
http://www.artima.com
--~--~-~
Wondering what's the normal practice of using a Box. As a Java
developer, I always want to get the boxed value by a method named
"Value" like
val optionalContent = Full("This is optional")
Log.info( " The optional content is " + optionalContent.value)
But I know its not a valid way to do so in
http://blog.lostlake.org/index.php?/archives/50-The-Scala-Option-class-and-how-lift-uses-it.html
The for comprehension is your friend.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Ferdinand Chan wrote:
>
> Wondering what's the normal practice of using a Box. As a Java
> developer, I always want to get the
Bill, can I propose you and I get together at devoxx and discuss the
options?
I belive my talk is not long after yours!
Cheers, Tim
Sent from my iPhone
On 11 Nov 2009, at 21:50, Bill Venners wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was talking with David Pollak the other night about putting some
> ScalaTest e
OracleDriver doesn't work with CRUDify when attempting to view a
list of entries, it gets an SQL error due to use of LIMIT/OFFSET,
which Oracle does not support. Defining brokenLimit_? = true
in OracleDriver makes it work for me. I can do this myself by including
my own copy of Driver.scala, so
I'll be working in the morning (US Mountain time) on upgrading ReviewBoard,
just in case anyone notices any hiccups.
Derek
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send ema
Sorry for what may seem like a stupid question, but I am very new to
scala/lift.
PCDataXmlParser solved my issue with w3 dtd but I am now getting a
parse error when I get a http stream.
:96:5: '<' not allowed in attrib valuegoogle_ad_type =
"text_image";^
Exception in thread "main" java.lang
What do you want to happen if you call "value" on an Empty?
-
Ferdinand Chan wrote:
Wondering what's the normal practice of using a Box. As a Java
developer, I always want to get the boxed value by a method named
"Value" like
val optionalContent = Full("This
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Timothy Perrett
wrote:
>
> Wouldn't a more appropriate idiom be to use overloaded apply methods in a
> companion object?
>
> That is:
>
> def apply(node: NodeSeq): XmlResponse
> def apply(node: NodeSeq, cookies: List[HTTPCookie]): XmlResponse
>
> Thoughts?
one more thing: I also ran the code without the piece that retrieves
web pages and gets their length. Instead I just had the Calculator
class sleep for 10 seconds (which is longer than the http request
takes) and then return a random number. This worked fine. I can't see
what the difference is.
O
38 matches
Mail list logo
