I'm playing around with CRUDify and to some extent it is flexible.
However, requirements for more flexibility made me extend the CRUDify,
but finally I ended up having all the impl on my own.
So I have a couple of questions about Mapper design strategies. For
example, I want some MappedFields
Quick and dirty impl could look like this:
import _root_.scala.xml.{NodeSeq, Text}
import _root_.net.liftweb.mapper._
import _root_.net.liftweb.util._
import _root_.net.liftweb.http._
import S._
import _root_.java.text.{DateFormat,SimpleDateFormat}
class
I have seen EXACTLY same behavior when dbColumnName returned _upcased_ names
lopex
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To
DMB pisze:
This makes me wonder how these number compare to other Java frameworks
as well as to Mono XSP.
It's hard to do an apples to apples comparison with these things, but
on the Microsoft side I've seen ASP.NET serve way more pages per
second than that (2-3x), on what would now be
On 2009-12-14 02:26, DMB wrote:
That's a common misconception among Java folks. Leaving aside the
relative merits of the various web frameworks, .NET runtime is about
10% faster on Windows in steady state than Sun Server JRE, and it uses
Back it up by a decent benchmark, otherwise tell me
